Yesterday I came across a 'meme' about the second amendment in the US and it sticked with me..

The second amendment (gun BS law) was created with the Musket in mind that could fire ~max 2 rounds per minute.

These days many (US Fanboys :blobderpverified:​) don't have Muskets anymore but AR15's for example. This stupid weapon fires 400 rounds per minute ⚠️ What the actually fucking fuck is what I ask..

For hunting deer? "Protecting" yourself? From what? Aliens?

This shit is one of the things keeping me from moving there. Why would I want ppl around me who think guns are okay and cool..

I call it a sickness.

Fuck guns!

@stux the point of the law was for protection against a tyrannous state and so the idea was to keep civilian arms in line with military arms, and it’s a misconception that only muskets existed at that time

There were rifled weapons being made and prototyped and the puckle gun existed which showed that high rates of fire could be achieved

Just like those in the 60s didn’t envision the moon landing technology as the peak of space technology, neither did those in the 18th century see muskets as the final evolution either

It took less than 100 years after the amendment for the Gatling gun to come out

uspol redux 

@Arcana @stux every time a people the US rose up to protect themselves from the tyranny *of* the US, they were brutally beaten down, and then the laws were amended so it would be harder for *them* to get weapons.

black panthers patrolling black neighbourhoods to protect them from police brutality is an insurrection.

mass shootings in schools twice a day is a terrible tragedy that nobody can do nothing against. it also keeps people in check, so 🤷🏻‍♀️

re: uspol redux 

@meena @stux if you look at the statistics for school shootings and similar, you can see they’ve massively been increasing over the past decade

Before 1986, it was possible to obtain fully automatic weapons easily and yet this did not increase school shooting rates, in fact there were barely any

Firearms are not the issue causing this, and the proletariat should not be disarmed to address an issue that is not even caused by firearms in the first place, that just plays into the state’s narrative

An ever increasing erosion of community, and material conditions is driving the rise in these things. To target firearms is to put a band aid over a very serious and worsening issue that neoliberal system of government cannot fix and in fact makes increasingly worse

Minority groups should be armed, and any attempts to disarm the working classes should be resisted. Especially with how many police and soldiers have right leaning tendencies, supporting laws to make them the only ones capable of bearing arms is incredibly dangerous
Follow

gun politics 

@Arcana @meena @stux

But, active school shootings have not increased. Non-active shooting as a side category has increased dramatically. The definition of non-active continues to broaden and includes such things as being caught with a weapon, having made possibly idle threats, or even "acting suspicious".

ezinearticles.com/?Whats-The-D

Active shooting extremely low, and has not changed much on average.
statista.com/statistics/971473

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.