doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2022.0463 via @royalsociety: The ideal of self-correction in science is not well served by the current culture & system surrounding amendments to published literature. This paper describes how amendments could work with an author-led version control system #SORTEEjournalclub

@sortee @royalsociety great to promote paper versions but #arXiv already does that. It is customary in math and some other disciplines to do minor updates there. And you can do major ones if you like too. Surely #EcoEvoRxiv can help since it is also a #postprint server. Probably more suitable for literature corrections than GitHub (which is definitely useful for code correction, but not enough alone).

Follow

@FredBarraquand @sortee @royalsociety I think this, along with Registered Reports, could be an excellent path toward improving many of the systemic issues with academic publishing. Any thoughts on integrating these two approaches?

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.