Show newer

@LibrosdeBabel A juzgar por lo que veo en librerías, la ficción ya no se escribe para hombres —hablo en general, obviamente hay nichos tipo Chuck Palahniuk (que tampoco son para todos los hombres).

El otro día fui con mi hermana a la Casa del Libro y, aparte de que no había más que gordas con pelos de colores, me di cuenta de que la ficción, ya desde sus portadas, está hecha para mujeres. Todas brillaban mucho y los bordes suelen formar algún tipo de dibujo. De hecho, en la Feria del Libro de Madrid, había casetas que mostraban los bordes de los libros en vez de las portadas o el lomo, lo cual me pareció rarísimo, pero entendible, viendo la tendencia.

For a brief amount of time, I was the tech lead of a software project. Before that, I thought that leading was a matter of gently telling people what to do, being open to questions and suggestions from the team, and, generally, being patient.

But the experience left me with more questions than answers. How can some people lead whole armies to their death while I couldn't even get my points across (i.e., “I'm afraid you're doing it wrong. You have to do it this way.” Or: “If you have doubts, don't waste time we don't have: Just ask.”)?

My first instinct was to think: “Well, you need to surround yourself with people who share your vision or at least are experienced enough to understand it.” But that seems like an easy way out. You can't always be surrounded by like-minded people, right?

So, how do charismatic leaders do it? Is it just that they seek idiots to manipulate? Can they really do it without some form of coercion or propaganda? I don't know.

I don't like being a boss, it's just that I usually know better what must be done or where we should go, so being a subordinate frustrates me, too.

I often censor myself because I fear people will think I'm pontificating instead of trying to start a conversation. Of course I will defend my opinion in that conversation, but still I'm open to change it if I'm convinced by the other person's arguments.

@bonifartius Of course surveillance isn't a consequence of technology existing, that was not the point of the cartoon. The point was that whoever controls technology is not using it for the common good, but to make money, and they make money by surveilling us and exploiting workers.

For instance, delivery food was already a thing in the 1980s. Tech bros didn't invent that. What tech bros did was getting in the middle of it and making money out of both restaurants and clients while paying next to nothing to workers.

When I say Luddism is the answer I mean that we have to fight this state of affairs somehow, and a good way to fight is not to consume their shitty and unnecessary services.

(If this arrives to you, it was because I can't reply to your qoto account for some reason.)

@noyoushutthefuckupdad I'm as sensitive to feminist dog whistles as you are, but there wasn't any contempt “for all men” in the cartoon. You're imagining things, Dad.

@noyoushutthefuckupdad Last time I watched Oliver was in 2016. I don't know what he's up to these days, but being an expert with many years of experience in the field, I can confidently say that tech bros are not there to solve our problems, but only to make money, even if they have to create new problems in the process. The fact that someone you don't like said this doesn't make it any less true.

I love how the author apologises in advance for her cartoon (“It's not a call to Luddism, I promise”), but every comment is basically: “Yes! Luddism is the answer!”

(I'm a computer programmer and I agree: Luddism is the answer. Also, we need to cut out the middlemen. They're parasites.)

Jen Sorensen  
Recent comic: Cutting out the Middleman I suspect that some readers might interpret this cartoon as a call for Luddism, but mostly it's a reflectio...

@prettygood You know your condition better than me, so I'll refrain from giving advice on things I know shit about from now on. I just hope you don't have to go through that again.

And, yes, cooking tasty stuff without salt is definitely a talent.

@prettygood I had a friend who went through the same thing and he said they told him the whole stone was basically salt. My father had one too years ago and he loved salty food.

That said, I'm not a doctor, but I thought it was common knowledge. Maybe I'm wrong.

@prettygood How are you doing? Did they tell you to cut on your salt consumption from now on, and all that?

@BitBun Good luck! I'm on the same situation right now. I need to leave this company I work for and I've seen how hard it is to switch these days.

josemanuel boosted

When I see people who aren't concerned about their data and #privacy in general, I get angry. Specially when they say, “I don't have anything to hide”. It's like you have to have something to hide to care.

A regular website, these days, shares your data with 500+ other websites and data exchanges.

If your data weren't relevant to them, they wouldn't jump through hoops and try to find loopholes to steal your data.

Grow the fuck up and pull your head out of your ass before it's too late

@kaia At least I'm on vacation now, so I don't have to fix that shit.

@kaia At least you didn't have eight months of your work thrown away by a retarded fatso with delusions of grandeur on the day we had to present it to the client. Also, nobody in the office speaks to me anymore because it was “not the time to speak about it.”

Seeing how 's LQ forum has become a cesspit of morons and gatekeepers, I have come to appreciate @alien's work and demeanor even more. He doesn't claim to speak for Pat and he gets very useful work done for the community. That's really something to admire.

@LibrosdeBabel Yo puedo decir que los conocía cuando la tienda era, literalmente, del tamaño de un dormitorio pequeño. Abajo había un sótano donde organizaban partidas de rol. Ahora es mucho más grande, claro, pero da igual, porque la mayoría de sus ventas son online, si no me equivoco.

Un detalle bonito es que, aunque han cambiado de ubicación varias veces, nunca se han ido del barrio.

josemanuel boosted

📣 ¿Te apasiona conectar personas y organizar eventos con propósito?
En Civio buscamos una persona proactiva, organizada y creativa para liderar nuestros eventos y fortalecer la relación con nuestra comunidad. 👫

🧠 Alguien que sepa producir un evento impecable y también imaginar formas originales de acercar nuestro trabajo a más gente.

🕐 Media jornada | 💼 Incorporación al equipo
📩 Envíanos tu candidatura antes del 10 de agosto.
👉 Todos los detalles aquí: civio.es/novedades/2025/07/24/

@mattskala To me it is, because I don't want to read that. I want to know if the profile is active, if it is interesting, not if it was years ago. The “read this first” info can go in the bio. Actually, if they asked me, I'd say that's where it belongs.

@mattskala To be honest, I think most people use pinned posts as a sort of “greatest hits” and that's definitely annoying, at least for me. You go into someone's profile to see what kind of things they say, find out if they're worth a follow, and all you see are pinned posts from 2021. Not even introductions, just normal posts.

I'm not saying the use case you described doesn't happen, of course it does, but in my experience it's the exception, not the rule.

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.