Show newer

@Teeeye81 Why would it be there for NATO solidarity?

B-52 is strategic bomber capable of carrying nukes..

@RikaDerufu @sampo @hj We are reaching the new levels of retardism to the point where it's not even worth reading

Why are we investing 20B USD in intel after all the fuck ups they had? Why not AMD? RISC-V?

KREYREN :verified: boosted

@hj @sampo that wouldn't be a bad military decision as ppl in st. petersburg are protesting and this way it would turn into a movement to throw out putin

@hj @sampo Georgia was neutral in terms of russia and nato and look how it ended up for them.

We are already in a cold war it never ended just stalled

@sampo @hj It's not fault of russian citizens.. this is putin's war

even the captured prisoners of war by ukrainians said that this was supposed to be a training and that they would be killed/imprisoned if they disobeyed orders

@sampo @hj His economy is in shit.. that ain't enough time for him to take action.. it will be in a scenario where he can recover from the sanctions and re-finance the war efforts.

So the more countries join NATO the better atm

@sampo @hj He's saying that bcs he knows that NATO countries are non-invadable.

also trusting putin is what gets you in shit mcron learned that lesson the hard way

@hj i think that he wants the whole eurussia

@hj I think that it's beyond obvious that all he cares about is to restore and expand the former russian empire so finland is logically next in line..

If i were you then i would go annoy politicians to join NATO which would protect sweden as well to some extent

@hj similar for Soviet-Ukrainian war and yet here we are

@hj what a year as finland might be next in line for Russian forces

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.