Show newer

Difficulty with the preceding visual search affects brain activity in the following resting period
nature.com/articles/s41598-022

#neuroscience

YES. @jamesmharrison reminded me that "Inhibition is something that we DO".

But to tease apart dynamics of goal-directed activation amidst goal-directed suppression... especially when the goal may be unconscious or habitual in one instance, or skilled and volitional in another?

This new preprint may have the methodology needed to tease these things apart - "A mind-body interface alternates with effector-specific regions in motor cortex" 👇 biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/20

#neuroscience #homunculus

A mind-body interface alternates with effector-specific regions in motor cortex

Primary motor cortex (M1) has been thought to form a continuous somatotopic homunculus extending down precentral gyrus from foot to face representations[1][1],[2][2]. The motor homunculus has remained a textbook pillar of functional neuroanatomy, despite evidence for concentric functional zones[3][3] and maps of complex actions[4][4]. Using our highest precision functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data and methods, we discovered that the classic homunculus is interrupted by regions with sharpy distinct connectivity, structure, and function, alternating with effector-specific (foot, hand, mouth) areas. These inter-effector regions exhibit decreased cortical thickness and strong functional connectivity to each other, and to prefrontal, insular, and subcortical regions of the Cingulo-opercular network (CON), critical for executive action[5][5] and physiological control[6][6], arousal[7][7], and processing of errors[8][8] and pain[9][9]. This interdigitation of action control-linked and motor effector regions was independently verified in the three largest fMRI datasets. Macaque and pediatric (newborn, infant, child) precision fMRI revealed potential cross-species analogues and developmental precursors of the inter-effector system. An extensive battery of motor and action fMRI tasks documented concentric somatotopies for each effector, separated by the CON-linked inter-effector regions. The inter-effector regions lacked movement specificity and co-activated during action planning (coordination of hands and feet), and axial body movement (e.g., abdomen, eyebrows). These results, together with prior work demonstrating stimulation-evoked complex actions[4][4] and connectivity to internal organs (e.g., adrenal medulla)[10][10], suggest that M1 is punctuated by an integrative system for implementing whole-body action plans. Thus, two parallel systems intertwine in motor cortex to form an integrate-isolate pattern: effector-specific regions (foot, hand, mouth) for isolating fine motor control, and a mind-body interface (MBI) for the integrative whole-organism coordination of goals, physiology, and body movement. ### Competing Interest Statement DAF and NUFD have a financial interest in NOUS Imaging Inc. and may financially benefit if the company is successful in marketing FIRMM motion-monitoring software products. DAF and NUFD may receive royalty income based on FIRMM technology developed at Washington University School of Medicine and Oregon Health and Sciences University and licensed to NOUS Imaging Inc. DAF and NUFD are co-founders of NOUS Imaging Inc. These potential conflicts of interest have been reviewed and are managed by Washington University School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Sciences University and the University of Minnesota. The other authors declare no competing interests. [1]: #ref-1 [2]: #ref-2 [3]: #ref-3 [4]: #ref-4 [5]: #ref-5 [6]: #ref-6 [7]: #ref-7 [8]: #ref-8 [9]: #ref-9 [10]: #ref-10

www.biorxiv.org
Show thread

@neuroecology there seem to be various cross-posters, here is one: crossposter.masto.donte.com.br
I'm not sure how it will really work given that often on twitter you're replying to an ongoing conversation ... I haven't tried it but post if you get to know it ...

Hi, this is Greta. You are welcome to follow me here, if you prefer planet earth to planet mars.

About 25 years ago, Crick and Koch wrote a very thought-provoking paper,

nature.com/articles/34584

It tries to answer the question, why do feedforward (FF) and feedback (FB) projections have such different properties in terms of terminating in different cortical layers and physiological impact — something that's ignored in many recurrent network models of cortex.

i.o.w.: Why do higher areas talk so differently to lower areas than lower areas talk to higher areas?

Mastodon habits I'm trying to lock in, rather than revert to my Twitter habits:

1) use CWs liberally
2) when threading, set first post to "public" and the rest to "not listed"
3) don't forget the description text when posting images (had to work on that in Twitter too)
4) throw in hashtags like it was Tumblr or Instagram when you want to reach beyond your followers
5) pin and visit hashtags to find more people
6) boost a lot

For those of us who came from Twitter: here, clicking "favorite" is different from clicking "like" in Twitter. It just tells the writer "yeah, nice", without enhancing visibility. The only way to enhance visibility is to "boost" (basically, retweet). I suspect all this will change (different clients will have different algorithms, etc) but for now this is how it is...

@albertcardona I saw that too. I think he actually believes it.

Assessing pupil size as an index of activation of subcortical ascending arousal system nuclei during rest biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/20

Assessing pupil size as an index of activation of subcortical ascending arousal system nuclei during rest

Neuromodulatory nuclei that are part of the ascending arousal system (AAS) play a crucial role in regulating cortical state and optimizing task performance. Pupil diameter, under constant luminance conditions, is increasingly used as an index of activity of these AAS nuclei. Indeed, task-based functional imaging studies in humans have begun to provide evidence of stimulus-driven pupil-AAS coupling. However, whether there is such a tight pupil-AAS coupling during rest is not clear. To address this question, we examined simultaneously acquired resting-state fMRI and pupil-size data from 74 participants, focusing on six AAS nuclei: the locus coeruleus, ventral tegmental area, substantia nigra, dorsal and median raphe nuclei, and cholinergic basal forebrain. Activation in all six AAS nuclei was optimally correlated with pupil size at 0- to 2-second lags, suggesting that spontaneous pupil changes were almost immediately followed by corresponding BOLD-signal changes in the AAS. These results suggest that spontaneous changes in pupil size that occur during states of rest can be used as a noninvasive general index of activity in AAS nuclei. Importantly, the nature of pupil-AAS coupling during rest appears to be vastly different from the relatively slow canonical hemodynamic response function that has been used to characterize task-related pupil-AAS coupling. ### Competing Interest Statement The authors have declared no competing interest.

www.biorxiv.org

Here is research in my lab: parralab.org

Will be posting about signals and brain stimulation.

For a history of posts see: twitter.com/lucas_c_parra

Lets get started ...

Narratives synchronize our hearts: pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2206

Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.