Follow

@wolf480pl

Noticed you were mentioned in an article that made it to the front of HN. Congrats.

@wolf480pl

news.ycombinator.com/item?id=3

This interpretation of the law in this disturbing case has sparked discussion about the nature of security research.

“It shouldn't matter how strong the protection was,“ systems administrator @wolf480pl commented. “The purpose of security research is to find flaws in protections, the same flaws that could be used to do something malicious. That's the whole point. The difference between a security researcher and a cybercriminal isn't what protections they bypass, it's what they do after they find out that they can bypass a protection.”

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.