Show newer
mandlebro boosted
mandlebro boosted
mandlebro boosted
mandlebro boosted
mandlebro boosted
mandlebro boosted

"Buddhist meditation has two aspects - shamatha and vipashyana. We tend to stress the importance of vipashyana ('looking deeply') because it can bring us insight and liberate us from suffering and afflictions. But the practice of shamatha ('stopping') is fundamental."

This made me think of the well tempered clavier. I had always wondered at the structural reason for the preludes, given that they are followed only by a single fugue. It never felt like enough of a contrast for it to be a logic vs passion sort of thing, like in the chromatic fantasy and fugue. So maybe it's more to allow the listener to "stop" and settle into the tonality before diving into in depth of the fugue.

Are there any runners on here that carry while running? What gun do you carry and how do you carry it? I’ve been thinking about coming up with a set up for myself.

mandlebro boosted
mandlebro boosted
the year is 2022

in order to determine if something a stranger wrote is true I am forced to query the largest databases of human knowledge ever created for the term "fauci transgender monkey". i'm not even sure if they will return true results or if they will suppress the knowledge they hold.

what the fuck is going on, why am i suffering in this way, am i even alive, is this hell, i might be dead and i'm not sure

I've been reading Elemnts of Statistical Learning by Hastie et. al. And I'm pretty sure the following ingredients is just wrong: "Note that the actual maximizer of the likelihood occurs when e put a spike of infinite height at any one dara point..." pg 274 par 4. They are talking about gaussian mixtures. But if you interpret this literally then the likelihood is 0 since all the other points have likelihood 0. If you interpret it in the limit the same occurs. The limit goes to zero, since one point in the product goes to 1 and the rest go to zero. Am I missing something? The book's been good so far.

mandlebro boosted
mandlebro boosted
mandlebro boosted

I think I just realized what bothered me thematically about Squid Game. Early on (first two episodes), it seemed like the thesis was that the games were better than capitalism because they are more fair. They were more like the ideal that capitalism is sold as, as opposed to the hopeless reality of most of the characters' lives. But as the show went on and the games got more random and arbitrary, that really breaks down and it seems like the games are supposed to be more of a direct metaphor for capitalist society, which is just the author saying "Look! Capitalist society is cruel and unfair just like the contrived metaphor I've come up with! " It's also just a boring take that's been done over and over.

mandlebro boosted
"Maybe if we respected the domestic jobs more, made them valuable (well paid)?"

I would go more radical than this, we need a change in the way that we view what is valuable to us and to society as a whole. This is the result of valuing income and the economy above everything else. I don't think you can escape this through paying better.
mandlebro boosted
mandlebro boosted
mandlebro boosted
mandlebro boosted
prohibitionists tried to ban alcohol, resulting in the rise of organised crime bootleggers like the Bronfmanns

green activists tried to ban non-renewable power, resulting in the economic rise of gas producing nations like Russia
Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.