Ian Bogost asked Final Round AI to supply him with a final round job interview question

"It returned a lengthy, milquetoast answer... The entire thing was plausible in the way LLM responses often are; if an aspiring writer provided this response during a genuine interview, it wouldn’t be wrong so much as uninspired. It is the sound of a person performing the role of a job candidate, rather than one actually pursuing a job."
theatlantic.com/technology/202
@genai@lemmy.graphics

Follow

@mapto@masto.bg actually in this article Bogost gives a definition of that I find to be better than Graeber's. It's not so much about the job being meaningless, as about the detachment of the employee from it. Ultimately if one doesn't understand the meaning of a job, they do not understand why and how to do it. This is unrelated to whether the job has a meaning as perceived by someone else:
"For some time now, workers—and especially young ones—have become ever more detached from their work lives. David Graeber called the roles they end up taking for lack of any better option “bullshit jobs.” Internet culture has more recently nicknamed them “email jobs”: work whose purpose is so cryptic, its effort detaches from motivations and outcomes, personal or professional. The Millennials who graduated into the Great Recession talked about LARPing their own jobs in order to reconcile this divide. Cheating on a job interview with AI feels like a realization of that vision: You are no longer a job candidate, but a person playing the role of one."

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.