Martin Ruskov @mapto@qoto.org

Have we talked about this paper yet on bsky? It's really good, and ought to be cited widely by people working at the humanities-AI interface. TLDR: If AI is going to be applied to fuzzy human problems, social science measurement theory becomes essential. #MLSky

RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:7w343tl3hi4tamcyhze6c6ag/post/3lheeokjw7k2u

Ahead of #MothersDay, Buddhism offers a complex lens.

The Buddha saw family as an obstacle to enlightenment—yet he honored two mothers: Maya, who gave birth to him, and Mahaprajapati, the aunt who raised him and became the first Buddhist nun.

Their stories still shape Buddhist views on motherhood and gender.
https://theconversation.com/remembering-buddhas-2-mothers-on-mothers-day-255368

@histodons #Histodons #Buddhism

Amazon publishes Generative AI Adoption Index and the results are something! And by “something” I mean “annoying”.

I don’t know how seriously I should take the numbers, because it’s Amazon after all and they want to make money with this crap, but on the other hand they surveyed “senior IT decision-makers”… and my opinion on that crowd isn’t the highest either.

Highlights:

Prioritizing spending on GenAI over spending on security. Yes, that is not going to cause problems at all. I do not see how this could go wrong.
The junk chart about “job roles with generative AI skills as a requirement”. What the fuck does that even mean, what is the skill? Do job interviews now include a section where you have to demonstrate promptfondling “skills”? (Also, the scale of the horizontal axis is wrong, but maybe no one noticed because they were so dazzled by the bars being suitcases for some reason.)
Cherry on top: one box to the left they list “limited understanding of generative AI skilling needs” as a barrier for “generative AI training”. So yeah…
“CAIO”. I hate that I just learned that.

AI is incapable of understanding reality from absolute made up bullshit.

Remember this next time you think trusting the top result from Google’s “AI summary” is an appropriate way of being a responsible member of society.

A report by IBM explains part of the hype around GenAI:

25% of AI initiatives have delivered expected ROI over the last few years

52% of CEOs say their organization is realizing value from generative AI investments beyond cost reduction

For 64% of CEOs the risk of falling behind drives investment in some technologies before they have a clear understanding of the value they bring, but only 37% prefer to be “fast and wrong” than “right and slow”

https://newsroom.ibm.com/2025-05-06-ibm-study-ceos-double-down-on-ai-while-navigating-enterprise-hurdles
@techtakes

A piece of history we cannot afford to forget… nor to allow be rewritten.

During the decade-long conflicts, the major powers dithered as Serb militias carried out their brutal campaigns of ethnic cleansing. Guardian reporters became more passionate and more outspoken in their condemnation, attracting praise and criticism

@mzedp @necedema @Wyatt_H_Knott @futurebird @grammargirl Representative example, which I did *today*, so the “you’re using old tech!” excuse doesn’t hold up.

I asked ChatGPT.com to calculate the mass of one curie (i.e., the amount producing a specific number of radioactive decays per second) of the commonly used radioactive isotope cobalt-60.

It produced some nicely formatted calculations that, in the end, appear to be correct. ChatGPT came up with 0.884 mg, the same as Wikipedia’s 884 micrograms on its page for the curie unit.

It offered to do the same thing for another isotope.

I chose cobalt-14.

This doesn’t exist. And not because it’s really unstable and decays fast. It literally can’t exist. The atomic number of cobalt is 27, so all its isotopes, stable or otherwise, must have a higher mass number. Anything with a mass number of 14 *is not cobalt*.

I was mimicking a possible Gen Chem mixup: a student who confused carbon-14 (a well known and scientifically important isotope) with cobalt-whatever. The sort of mistake people see (and make!) at that level all the time. Symbol C vs. Co. Very typical Gen Chem sort of confusion.

A chemistry teacher at any level would catch this, and explain what happened. Wikipedia doesn’t show cobalt-14 in its list of cobalt isotopes (it only lists ones that actually exist), so going there would also reveal the mistake.

ChatGPT? It just makes shit up. Invents a half-life (for an isotope, just to remind you, *cannot exist*), and carries on like nothing strange has happened.

This is, quite literally, one of the worst possible responses to a request like this, and yet I see responses like this *all the freaking time*.

I know there is a lot for academics to study about the actual use and development of LLMs, but I need sociologists and historians of science to be writing books on the style and speed of research communication in this area. New vocabulary every day! Citing blog posts! Reviews of review articles!

#USpolitics #PopCulture #movies #film #dystopia

I never saw/read this Oct 2016 Cracked article on the looming dystopia...

(and I'm not sure it would have convinced me, but... hindsight etc. etc.)

(I mean, I thought the Tea Party had been a problem, and so it was. But only because it was a precursor)

https://www.cracked.com/blog/6-reasons-trumps-rise-that-no-one-talks-about

Suggestion: if your support process starts with telling your customers they shouldn't - and thus cannot - trust your answers, you should, JUST PERHAPS, reevaluate.

#Miles #AI #Chatbot #wtf