Martin Ruskov @mapto@qoto.org

@TheConversationUS "Chip manufacturing behaves less like a competitive commodity market and more like a layered oligopoly. Scale matters because the leading firms can reinvest in research, improve yields, secure equipment and deepen customer relationships. In the case of graphics processor chips, designers such as NVIDIA, which has 85% market share, depend on advanced semiconductor foundries such as TSMC, which has more than 70% market share, to manufacture chips using extreme ultraviolet lithography machines from ASML, a monopoly."

Related:
"The bulletproof marker to Emmett Till at Graball Landing, in Mississippi

Selected by Sarah Lewis

President Joe Biden, in his last days in office, announced an act to create a monument to Emmett Till and Mamie Till-Mobley. Near Glendora, Miss., is a marker that offers evidence of the need for this act—a marker that is deliberately 500 lbs. and bulletproof, covered with abrasion-resistant acrylic. It is the fourth time a marker has been placed there; the first three were all shot and thrown in the Tallahatchie River, where Till was found. Till helped inspire the Civil Rights Movement that we know today; the resistance to honoring him speaks to the work that remains before we can all claim freedom on American ground.

Lewis is the founder of the Vision and Justice initiative and currently the John L. Loeb Associate Professor of the Humanities and Associate Professor of African and African American Studies at Harvard University; she is also the organizer of the exhibition and book If Emmett Till Lived…, set to premiere in September."
https://time.com/collection/our-america-250/2026/art-that-defines-america/

But I find it tremendously disappointing that so many of the "American tech insiders" in this list are so obsessed with what they do. To the extent that they declare it to be the most defining thing for their society.

Do these people really consider themselves so exceptional that they believe they personally are responsible for the most important changes in society? Or is it that they are so much engaged in their petty business, that they can't stop selling even when asked a big question? To me it doesn't really matter - either way they fail to live up to the expectations arriving with the question.

Here's an answer for a life-changing technology that truly stands out:

"The Bicycle
Selected by Reshma Saujani

In the 1890s, the bicycle, as we know it today, finally let women go where they wanted, on their own, without asking permission. It even played a central role in the fight for women’s suffrage—a simple machine with outsized impact. Today, it reminds us what technology should do: expand freedom and opportunity. Millions of American women are still fighting for what the bicycle once gave them: the freedom to move, make decisions, and control their own futures. At 250 years in, that’s still the most American question we can ask of any new technology: Will it set people free?
Saujani is a lawyer, activist, and the founder of the nonprofits Girls Who Code and Moms First."
https://time.com/collection/our-america-250/2026/tech-innovations-that-define-america/

@claudeai this probably explains the investment. Looks cool. I really hope they can make this sustainable, because ever-growing generalist models are not. Not environmentally, not financially, not in any meaningful way.

@benzinazero giustamente l'autore si vergogna di sottoscrivere, perché una spiegazione così inadeguata merita un titolo diverso:

"«Ero praticamente ferma. Faccio sempre questa strada e lo so che c'è una ciclabile» ha raccontato con gli occhi lucidi all'incrocio tra via Paolo Veronese e via IV Novembre al figlio del 68enne. La guidatrice doveva immettersi sulla principale quando, procedendo in avanti di qualche metro, si è trovata il 68enne sul cofano. «Ho visto che un'auto stava svoltando e, tempo di voltarmi, ho visto la bicicletta arrivarmi addosso. Stavo andando piano»."