Show newer

Jeffrey Epstein’s ties to prominent universities are shining a spotlight on donor screening.

Individual donors fund only a small share of research (about 3%), but even small gifts can raise big ethical questions.

theconversation.com/individual

@TheConversationUS "High-profile propaganda products frequently fail to resonate. Music charts and streaming platforms in Russia are dominated not by patriotic anthems but by an eclectic mix of songs about personal relationships, such as Jakone’s moody ballad “Eyes As Wet As Asphalt,” songs in praise of “Hoodies” and even a catchy Bashkir folk song.

Book sales show strong demand for works such as George Orwell’s “1984” and Viktor Frankl’s Holocaust memoir “Man’s Search for Meaning,” suggesting that readers are searching for ways to understand authoritarianism, trauma and moral responsibility rather than celebrating militarism.

And instead of watching the state-backed film “Tolerance,” a dystopian tale of moral decay in the West, Russians are streaming the “Heated Rivalry” gay hockey romance."

Regarding the extremely insightful exchange between @tante and @pluralistic that unfolded yesterday, there is a bit too much of ideology in it for my taste. However, I couldn't help noticing that arguably the strongest point of Tante about the ideology of LLMs is based on an invalid argument he developed in 2024: the claim that "open-source LLMs do not really exist".

Tante makes a case that open weights is not open source, and that's a valid point. Back then it was probably difficult to see the open source (open weights, open data and more) LLMs that actually exist. Many of them are specialised, and commonly they'd perform even worse than open weights ones. Yet, they are out there and I'd claim they are inevitably going to be an important part of the future.

I've been studying particularly specialised models like MacBERTh, but there are also open autoregressive instruction-tuned (i.e. chatgpt-like) models. Now there's even the Model Openness Framework and the corresponding tool and ranking: mot.isitopen.ai

This might be seen as opening a conversation about whether we can separate affordances of technologies from their politics, but as I said, I have too many doubts about ideology to be willing to go down that path.

PS: I come late to the conversation and I'm a nobody in this community. Yet, if curious, I invite you to see my pinned posts to see what I'm doing around the topic.

Tante's original post: tante.cc/2024/10/16/does-open-

ggml.ai joins HuggingFace

ggml.ai is better known as the entity behind llama.cpp. It's nice to hear good news! Thank you @ggerganov and @huggingface

github.com/ggml-org/llama.cpp/

@llm

Hey, whether you work in tech or not, if you use Python, please do take a couple minutes to fill out the 2026 Python Developers Survey: surveys.jetbrains.com/s3/pytho

Is teasing playful or harmful? Research shows the answer often comes down to details like:

• power differences
• the topic (identity & sensitive issues are off-limits)
• whether it stops when asked
• repetition

Via The Conversation Canada:
theconversation.com/is-teasing

and here's the mechanism: they threaten and then shift the blame. European companies not planning to migrate away are falling behind.

theregister.com/2026/02/18/mic

Show thread

Il Pentagono vuole classificare Anthropic AI come "supply chain risk"

"La controversia sembra derivare dalla riluttanza di Anthropic a consentire un uso militare illimitato dei propri sistemi di IA. Attualmente, i modelli di Anthropic sono gli unici strumenti di IA disponibili all'interno di sistemi militari classificati tramite fornitori terzi, come Palantir Technologies, e anche in questo caso sono soggetti ad alcune restrizioni. Reuters ha precedentemente riferito che i dirigenti di Anthropic hanno comunicato ai funzionari militari di non volere che i propri sistemi fossero utilizzati per il puntamento di armi autonome o la sorveglianza interna."
gizmodo.com/pentagon-considers
@aitech

From the crash of our nuclear bomber in Greenland in 1968.

“Cancer-stricken Danes who cleaned up US #nuclear bomber crash in #Greenland are fighting for recognition, money”

nypost.com/2026/02/14/us-news/

In a massive blow to the handful of scientists and academics who still dispute widely-accepted climate science, the Trump administration discarded a signature report by its own “Climate Working Group.” It comes as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) officially scrapped the government’s  endangerment finding — the official recognition that greenhouse gases harm human health and the environment. In an […]

The post Trump EPA Abandons Climate Working Group Report in Endangerment Finding Repeal appeared first on DeSmog.

After Russia’s invasion of Ukraine triggered an about-face on NATO membership, Sweden is considering another historic shift in adopting the euro. japantimes.co.jp/business/2026 #business #markets #us #donaldtrump #sweden #euro

Even with Trump’s support, coal power remains expensive – and dangerous. President Trump has ordered the military to buy more electricity generated by coal, but professors of law and environmental economics explain the limits to his power to bring coal back. theconversation.com/even-with-

Hate isn't love's opposite, according to a religious ethicist, but rather a reaction to threats against what we love. Reframing love as a virtue instead of just a feeling could transform how we respond to hatred. buff.ly/zwxPPmI

@Sunshine
“Lessons are not learned when they are identified,” said retired Gen. David Petraeus. “Rather, they are only learned when you develop new concepts, write new doctrine, change organizational structures, overhaul your training, refine leader development courses, set out new materiel requirements that drive the procurement process, and even make changes to your personnel policies, recruiting, and facilities.”

Mass migration of US scientists to Europe

"According to data from the European Research Council (ERC), the European Union’s premier funding agency for basic research, applications from the United States for its starting, consolidator and advanced grants to individual researchers — worth up to €2.5 million apiece over five years — rose by 120% in its most recent round of calls, compared with an overall rise in applications of 17% (see ‘Choosing Europe’)."
nature.com/articles/d41586-026
@science

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.