Very nice article investigating the scientific soundness of claims that "trees talk to each other".

But "it's more likely that fungi distribute carbon according to their own interests". (1/4)

nytimes.com/2022/11/07/science

People like to hear stories like "trees are taking care of each other", "nature is beautiful" and these stories can start leading their own life. That doesn't mean that fungi aren't important - they are! - but there is much to be learned about their role in ecosystems. (2/4)

As scientists, it's great when people start seeing the importance of the organism or system that you are studying. But the risk is that scientists become vectors for unsubstantiated claims. (3/4)

“The true story is very interesting without this narrative put on it,” Dr. Karst said. The forest “is still a very mysterious and wonderful place.” (4/4)

Follow

@frantecol One of the things I like about nature is that there is still so much to be learned. Maybe we should all be scientists for a while, just to be aware of our ignorance. I understand the need to simplify things when communicating about science, but sound and clear disclaimers should always be part of it.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.