Follow

On a Los Angeles Times post, somebody commented, “Californians may not miss Elon Musk, but the economy will.”

I was curious enough to look this up: last year had $24.9 billion in , and $8.7 billion, while ’s was $3.9 trillion. So very roughly, Tesla + SpaceX revenue was almost 1% of California GDP, although I doubt all or even most of that money actually stayed in California.

That’s not insignificant, but it’s not vital either. Given California’s overall economic power, I think the state will absorb Musk’s departure just fine, especially since there’s no way to move a major industrial operation all at once. And most of Tesla’s manufacturing is already outside the state.

The main economic impact of moving everything to may be to (slightly) ameliorate the famously high housing prices in the Bay Area and LA metro. Also, it will raise the average intelligence of both states. That’s a win-win!

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.