A line in a mostly unrelated post by a friend got me thinking about a maxim I've heard a lot lately: " is not about predicting the , but rather commenting on the present." It's become conventional wisdom rapidly approaching the status of a thought-terminating cliche.

When I sit down to write , "what if" is my primary motivation. The here-and-now obviously shapes my thoughts, but I'm not *deliberately* writing about it—if I wanted to do that, I'd pick a different genre.

Maybe I'm not exactly trying to predict the future, but I am trying to make believable predictions about what *could* happen if such-and-such occurred. And I think most of the SF authors whose work I admire would agree with me, unless I'm just really bad at getting the point!

@medigoth absolutely, well put.

what if is a great starting point for speculative fiction, of which science fiction I offers unlimited potential.

social commentary is another great starting point.

or maybe the starting itself is the point. there is a reason it feels so exciting.

Follow

@falcennial Yeah, to me the starting is a lot more interesting than the commenting, most of the time. I don't object to commentary when it's done well. But I do object to the idea that it's what all or even most SF is about.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.