Show newer

From the comments on the Facebook post where I saw this: "And yet raises prices every year to and claims it is part of their extensive process."

I continue to believe there is value in the traditional system. Specialized , , peer review, even fees and paper copies—although really the number of paper copies needed is minimal, and subscription costs should be too. The major journals have done a lot to encourage high-quality and spread , and I hope they keep doing so for quite some time to come.

None of which means any *specific* journal or publisher should continue to exist, and this shows why. The system is way overdue for a serious mucking out.

: "You look so yummy I could just eat you up! Be my valentine?"

: "No."

(art by Tuomas Koivurinne)

One of my favorite concert memories is of being at an show when some yob in the audience shouted "set shit on fire!" ... and snapping back, "We do not need to set things on fire. We have to do that for us."

It might be the angle, but that looks kind of peaky and heavy-tailed to me. I suspect whoever designed the church adheres to the Leptokurtotic Heresy.

Performative support for the government does not provide cover for welcoming literal into the ranks. There’s a lot more to the issue than that, and I do believe there is a significant and disturbing * strain on the left. But it’s not the blue team that will bring the barbed wire and ovens.

*Everyone knows what “anti-Semitic” means, yes? Okay, good. Moving on.

Huh, my idea of doesn’t line up with my idea of *at all*. But maybe that whole "" thing is just a clever disguise for their ambitions.

BWAHAHAHA.

I think the people running 's campaign have no idea how much most want out-of-staters to stay that way.

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.