@malwaretech The DNC leak was not Russian intelligence, that was debunked, it was an internal leak. Please don't spread disinformation.
@modrobert @viraptor @malwaretech
Jennifer Kerns (@JenKernsUSA) is a contributor to the Washington Examiner's Beltway Confidential blog. A GOP communications strategist, she served as spokeswoman for the California Republican Party, recalls in Colorado, and California's Prop. 8. Previously, she served as a writer for the 2016 U.S. presidential debates for FOX News.
@modrobert @viraptor @malwaretech
Guccifer 2.0 from GRU was the most likely source of the DNC leak.
Despite what the Washington Examiner says.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/washington-examiner/
Jennifer Kerns (@JenKernsUSA) is a contributor to the Washington Examiner's Beltway Confidential blog. A GOP communications strategist, she served as spokeswoman for the California Republican Party, recalls in Colorado, and California's Prop. 8. Previously, she served as a writer for the 2016 U.S. presidential debates for FOX News.
@modrobert
Yeah...this is not a reliable source. Do better.
@viraptor @malwaretech
@modrobert @viraptor @malwaretech That Washington Examiner article is completely based on an article by Patrick Lawrence in The Nation about a report from Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) that *many VIPS members objected to.*
There’s more to the story than just picking the narrative you like best.
Here is the follow up to Lawrence’s article and the article itself. Go to the source.
@modrobert @malwaretech You’ve got it badly wrong here. Cozy Bear and Fancy Bear.
https://web.archive.org/web/20160821151215/http://www.threatgeek.com/2016/06/dnc_update.html
@modrobert @malwaretech got links that confirm it?