@georgia @mewmew @shebang @tuxcrafting @wowaname You literally have no idea what your talking about. What is hypocritical about things like Corporatism, National Syndicalism and Guild Socialism. What does this have to do with race. Race is a construction used and formulated by will and power dynamics.

Mussolini ignored race and said things like

"Race? It is a feeling, not a reality. Ninety-five per cent, at least. Nothing will ever make me believe that biologically pure races can be shown to exist today.... National pride has no need of the delirium of race."

It wasn't until pressure from Hitler that Mussolini put in some racial and "Anti-Semitic" laws. Around this time that Mussolini started to put some "Anti-Semitic" rhetoric in his speeches.

In the post before quoted José Antonio Primo de Rivera. For Rivera a nation isn't defined by a biological race, but by a "shared destiny".

Codreanu built things not around race, but around Orthodox Christianity.

Then, you have the Integralist in Brazil. One thing that the Integralist made clear was that race isn't important to them.

The Strasser brothers believed that Africans, Jews and any race although they may not be the same in blood, behavior or skin may be integrated as Germans.

Also, look at me. I criticize people like George Lincoln Rockwell for turning things into little more the a "racist conservatism". I will then say that Huey Long was far greater. Huey Long was clear that "every man a king" means "every man a king" no matter what race. Huey Long put in programs to uplift the poor, and even helped give black people public education, healthcare, tax exemptions, and the opportunity to vote free of charge. I'm not saying that "I'm not racist"; my optics are to be full, upfront and honest. I hate niggers and I hate kikes, but I in general condemn most race-based programs for America.

Let's also look at this section from Francis Yockey's book Imperium;

"Race is, in the first instance—in its subjective sense—what a man feels. This influences, whether immediately or eventually, what he does. A man of race is not born to slavery. If his intellect counsel him to a temporary submission, rather than an heroic death, in the hope of future changes, it is a mere postponement of his breaking out. The man without race will submit permanently to any humiliation, any insult, any dishonor, so long as he is permitted to live. The continuance of breathing and digestion are Life to the man without race. To the man of race, Life itself represents no value, but only Life under the right conditions, affirmative Life, rich, expressive and growing.

"Heroism can be motivated from either side of the soul: the martyr dies for the Truth which he knows, the fighting man who dies with weapons in his hands rather than submit to his enemies dies for the honor that he feels. But the man who dies for something higher shows that he has race, regardless of his intellectualized motives. For Race is the faculty of being true to one’s self It is the placing of a beyond-value on one’s own individual soul.

"In this subjective sense. Race is not the way one talks, looks, gestures, walks, it is not a matter of stock, color, anatomy, skeletal structure, or anything else objective. Men of Race are scattered through all populations everywhere, through all races, peoples, nations. In each unit they make up the warriors, the leaders of
action, the creators in the sphere of politics and war."

Here race isn't something objective. Race here is just a necessary political motivator, and a way of building an Anti-Individualism and sense of heroism.

It seems like you built you understanding of this around people like Hitler. I doubt you even of a full understanding of the ideological base.

I don't take a "reactionary stance against capitalism". I view Conservationism, Reaction and anything that want's to keep what we have or move back to the past as inherently degenerate and de-evolutionary. I'm not going to become a tradcath for two reasons. The first being I am anti-trad (for it being inherently degenerate and de-evolutionary) and the other is that I feel no spiritual connection to it.

What's the fist word of my bio? It's Futurist. What Futurism is was best defined by Balilla Pratella;

"Futurism, which is a rebellion of the life of intuition and feeling, a palpitating and impetuous spring-time, inevitably declares war against doctrines, individuals, or works that repeat, prolong, or praise the past at the expense of the future."

You are in total ignorance of how the philosophical base of Fascism came about. You can say "literally just kin fetishism" because you don't know the philosophical base of Fascism or where it came from. You ignore that Fascism is built of things like Neo-Hegelianism, Futurism and Romanticism (this is less true of other movements like the National Socialist in Germany).

Thinking of Fascism in a purely political context, the most important part is the Hegelian the conception of state. A rejection of things like the the Hobbesian conception of state as being a necessary evil. Hegel gets into his conception of the state in Philosophy of Right;

"The state is the actuality of the ethical Idea. It is ethical mind quathe substantial will manifest and revealed to itself, knowing and thinking itself, accomplishing what it knows and in so far as it knows it. The state exists immediately in custom, mediately in individual self-consciousness, knowledge, and activity, while self-consciousness in virtue of its sentiment towards the state, finds in the state, as its essence and the end-product of its activity, its substantive freedom.

"The Penates are inward gods, gods of the underworld; the mind of a nation (Athene for instance) is the divine, knowing and willing itself. Family piety is feeling, ethical behaviour directed by feeling; political virtue is the willing of the absolute end in terms of thought.

"The state is absolutely rational inasmuch as it is the actuality of the substantial will which it possesses in the particular self-consciousness once that consciousness has been raised to consciousness of its universality. This substantial unity is an absolute unmoved end in itself, in which freedom comes into its supreme right. On the other hand this final end has supreme right against the individual, whose supreme duty is to be a member of the state.

"If the state is confused with civil society, and if its specific end is laid down as the security and protection of property and personal freedom, then the interest of the individuals as such becomes the ultimate end of their association, and it follows that membership of the state is something optional. But the state’s relation to the individual is quite different from this. Since the state is mind objectified, it is only as one of its members that the individual himself has objectivity, genuine individuality, and an ethical life. Unification pure and simple is the true content and aim of the individual, and the individual’s destiny is the living of a universal life. His further particular satisfaction, activity and mode of conduct have this substantive and universally valid life as their starting point and their result.

"Rationality, taken generally and in the abstract, consists in the thorough-going unity of the universal and the single. Rationality, concrete in the state, consists (a) so far as its content is concerned, in the unity of objective freedom (i.e. freedom of the universal or substantial will) and subjective freedom (i.e. freedom of everyone in his knowing and in his volition of particular ends); and consequently, (b) so far as its form is concerned, in self-determining action on laws and principles which are thoughts and so universal. This Idea is the absolutely eternal and necessary being of mind."

You know literally nothing about what you talk about. If you want to truly understand Fascism then read Giovanni Gentile. I would also recommend reading Georges Sorel, and if your up for the challenge Hegel.