Follow
@georgia What we so casually call sexes or their inclinations, to a biologist is a great mystery, a discovery of even a minor aspect of which, they would happily dedicate their entire life to (what the hell is wrong with my english -_-). The arguments of the majority and the usual is in the realm of basic statistics and requires no actual study of biology. I get triggered when people pretend to science. He basically requires empirical evidence, but his approach is to ignore all reason in the name of "science". I genuinely think he would have been more clear if he said god, I could at least respect the honesty in that.
@orekix @allison @Prodigal
Your lack of understanding of my point, and my known religious leanings, are by no means license to claim I have intellectual dishonesty.
Rather than ask: "can you truly assert and explain that claim without religious bias?" you end up help propagate lies.
The lies being, (1) I supposedly don't understand what I am saying, and (2) that I am persecuting someone's for their sexuality based on my religious biases.