would you call a wrapper type, that holds a pointer to a container provides a range interface through that pointer, a range_reference or a reference_range?
hmmm... referring_range?? indirect_range???
@ercadio but aren't there a lot of other things you could call that? Also view suggests to me that it's read-only.
@namark sure, I think we are running out of names for non-owning containers. reference_range is good I guess, or observer_range if that makes sense with observer_ptr
@namark just be careful with those because pointers are often invalidated
@ercadio great, now I have to generalize on the pointer type to allow different ownership models...
@mew27 absolute genius!
https://git.sr.ht/~namark/libsimple_support/tree/703a75b6711dd6fa417c7af1a05933530f6c9fea/item/source/simple/support/misc.hpp#L146
... pending poll results
@namark range or range_view