I see Julie is mad? at Discord because they reckon that scanning for abuse in livestreams would be prohibitively expensive? Aren't there like a hundred cases in any particular year in the world? I recall someone (who used to work at FB) came up with a number like this in 2021 (I don't pay close attention to it).

There's a religious savior group which claims higher, however, they're accused by progressive outlets of having a history of making misleading exaggerated claims.

It feels like another case of "let's find an excuse to be mad at tech companies"? This is not going to grow your tech sector, Julie.

She is also upset that companies aren't invading user privacy, because of course she is. She also appears to be advocating measures which would likely have extremely high rates of false positives, because of course she is.