Since it's been mentioned that Ylva consulted with these people:

Farid seems to have associations with Microsoft. He behaves very activist. He doesn't consider things like proportionality or privacy.

Stamos is weird. He used to work for FB. He apparently had a fight with management (not over kids), left, and has since been attacking them for anything. That was when his "save the children" rhetoric started. He's slightly better than some others but still doesn't consider proportionality.

C3P (i.e. the Canadian Center) is a very activist group which calls people bad for considering fundamental rights, particularly the concepts of proportionality or privacy. They've been known for finding offense with a picture of a baby (an ordinary baby photo) on a band cover. They seem to have a status similar to NCMEC in Canada.

NCMEC has a weird status. They're nominally a non-profit group, however, I think they're there to avoid constitutional constraints, have special powers, and seem a lot like law enforcement. They're somewhat activist. They don't consider proportionality. One Court of Appeals decided they were a government actor, and possibly, even a government agency.

We know Thorn. Founded by Ashton Kutcher, Hollywood actor and investor in AI firms. He stands to gain financially from pitching AI as a solution for everything.

Microsoft and Google aren't really companies known for standing up for your fundamental rights, though they have pushed back against extreme proposals in the past. I suspect they're not hostile to E2EE but I have serious doubts they're that eager about freedom of expression or privacy.

#chatcontrol