Follow

It's worth remembering that C3P's definition of "child porn" is very broad to the point of being useless. So, if someone is sitting in a room fully clothed, that can be "child porn" in their eyes (yes, there have been recorded cases like that). Whatever their reasoning is there, it is silly to scream at someone for not removing a particular item like that from a site on the spot.

In one case, they appeared to be uploading the images themselves to a search engine, then reporting them to get them taken down (even though they were only transiently cached in the search thing for minutes at a time). This is extremely problematic as it creates room for scandal over nothing.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.