@mattburgess Unfortunately, or perhaps, fortunately, this claim is false.
First off, from the terms I've seen, many of these terms do not involve child abuse. Not even actual children.
They even appear to be treating adult women *as* children (with a few terms), or appear to be pursuing whatever the charity deems to be obscene.
They also appear to overly interpret descriptors as relevant when they really seem quite fuzzy.
It is probable that they're driving away just as many people who aren't interested in pursuing CSAM from their site as they are those who are.