So, there is a consultation where a puritanical anti-porn Tory appointee[1] wants to censor free expression. She made a highly disturbing rant, and the British Government appears to be at great risk of becoming puritanical fascists (if they aren't already).
The Free Speech Coalition has met with her (it's probably not the one you're thinking of), so that might help[2].
https://qoto.org/@olives/111888946356326887 As always, here is my "porn isn't bad" science / knowledge pack.
If you're curious about the sorts of people who have been pushing for this particular thing, one who appeared before parliamentarians is the U.K.-based Vice-President of an American bunch of Christian fundamentalists rebranded, who go by the name of NCOSE (previously known as Morality in Media)[3], Haley McNamara.
It is worth mentioning also that these people tend to voice "concern" about something, then push for much broader censorship. This "baroness" appears to be looking to censor vast swathes of content, this is a disturbing and extreme attack on free expression.
They also mix / conflate real content with fantasy content, rely on highly misleading misrepresentations of the effects of porn, occasionally make use of dehumanizing tropes (nothing new[4]), and also, they might mix / conflate animated violence with realistic violence, and mild "aggression" with what might more typically be reviewed as "aggression".
It is a mess and extremely problematic.
1 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gabrielle_Bertin%2C_Baroness_Bertin
3 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Center_on_Sexual_Exploitation
