At least it doesn't seem? to be an obscenity law (i.e. perhaps targeting some sort of roleplay with vague criterion about what a depiction "looks like", rather than whether it was made to depict a particular person without their consent). I haven't looked deeply into it though. I'd hope someone would have to have actual knowledge that the depiction is non-consensual.
I'm not a fan of site blocking, as that usually involves collateral damage.
https://reason.com/2024/01/17/ai-fraud-act-could-outlaw-parodies-political-cartoons-and-more/ I suspect the concerns about art might be similar to the ones here.