"the terms "loli" and "lolita" also suffer from censorship in regards to lolicon content"

Actually referring to an incident from 2010.

"lolita" clearly originates from Nabokov's crappy book, and I think it would be dishonest to ignore that, although it's a book from something like 50 - 70 years ago, and it is hardly relevant in how it might be used now. Even Nabokov's book could be said to be a work of fiction, although it also appears to be more geared around shock, and that might have bearing on how someone in the West might perceive it.

I suspect though it's probably used without knowing that background, especially with the Japanese tendency for very vague terms which are highly context dependent, and a tendency for cutesy takes on just about anything. It can even mean roleplay or cosplay by adults. Or a particular cutesy type of fashion. And yes, this one also trips up "PornHub" (why anyone would want to use this site is anyone's guess), likely because of their dodgy source (who once flagged *Wikipedia* of all sites and are very weirdly motivated).

Because of that, it is hard to say that that is specifically being singled out, even if it is far, far more likely to be using that particular term. Censorship is not good in any case because https://qoto.org/@olives/112432593064021268 but it's a bit more complex than that.