Follow

It's nice to see more privacy based critiques of "" (to be accurate, artificial "intelligence") over the past few days rather than a few invoking QAnon type reasoning or arguments along the lines of the thought police (putting a big emphasis on people creating content which might be offensive to someone).

There are quite a few privacy questions here. Now, while there are certain controversies around things like the "right to be forgotten", which is likened to censorship, or "privacy" proposals which compel platforms to collect, say, face scans, this one seems to be a fairly straightforward application of privacy.

For instance, the Norwegian DPA doesn't think Facebook is following the GDPR in using data from their platform. The Italian one wasn't happy that "Open" AI used information from chat sessions with the bot for training it and ended up adding a setting to allow users to manage that (although, it seems they might still surveil users?). Now, there's a scandal with Microsoft, and even, yes, Adobe.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.