From what I've seen from a few advocates, there also never seem to be any lines which they decide they won't cross. Maybe, a low rate of accuracy, or violating the rights of innocent people. It is only about more state power / control.
As I've said before, someone might pitch something as a "standard", then later on in the cycle, they'll pitch what someone is already doing (which was formally pitched as "standard") as "negligence" and that someone "has to be" even more intrusive.
As I've said before, someone might pitch something as a "standard", then later on in the cycle, they'll pitch what someone is already doing (which was formally pitched as "standard") as "negligence" and that someone "has to be" even more intrusive.