https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2024/07/calls-mount-principal-un-human-rights-official-business-and-tech-groups-address Frankly, stronger language than just "artistic" should be used to protect #HumanRights and #FreeSpeech. For instance, constraining it to real people (this is already sort of done but it shouldn't be an optional point).
https://qoto.org/@olives/112853953984247398 Also, see this post (which also references science to question arguments about porn being spooky and other such things).
Useful human rights protective language is language which clearly and indisputably tells someone that x activity is allowed. No beating around the bush. Even if it might be "useful" now, who knows what someone might argue in 10, 15, 20 years. What stops a country from just ignoring it?
