This guy is practically a conspiracy decorum machine.
He takes misleading claims, outright conspiracies, a few outright lies from interpersonal conflicts, lifts things out of context, amplifies sensationalism, amplifies the views of extremist individuals, misrepresents the lack of competence / expertise of a student as evil intent, and misrepresents lower quality / incomplete content as "evidence" of conspiracy.
He also produces the impression that relatively small phenomena are larger than they actually are in an apparent bid to give further fuel to his conspiratorial frameworks. He also misconstrues everyday phenomena as if they are scandalous.
Then, he slaps a veneer of decorum onto that.
Also, apart from involving problematic misrepresentations, or conspiratorial framing, some of the points he raises relate to old and dusted things which are not relevant but which he attempts to construe as some sort of conspiracy.
These things might lead to someone being harassed, and all for a charlatan's grift.