https://reason.com/2024/07/18/want-to-catch-serial-killers-faster-listen-to-sex-workers/
"To catch current and future serial predators targeting sex workers in #NewYork, lawmakers should have taken up and passed an immunity bill introduced by state Sen. Luis R. Sepúlveda (D–Bronx) in 2023. The bill would have empowered victims of human trafficking and sex workers who experience or witness crimes to make a report and seek help without fear of being prosecuted for prostitution."
#HumanRights
https://reason.com/2024/07/18/fcc-will-cap-the-cost-of-prison-phone-calls/
""The Federal Communications Commission today voted to end exorbitant phone and video call rates that have burdened incarcerated people and their families for decades," the agency announced in a Thursday press release."
"Many of the over 1.2 million Americans incarcerated at any given time depend upon prison calls to maintain ties to friends and family. "Research shows frequent phone calls to family members increase jail safety, promote positive mental health outcomes, and help maintain connections with loved ones," wrote Nicole Loonstyn and Alice Galley of the Urban Institute in 2023."
#FreeSpeech #HumanRights
I'll repost this for now.
https://www.theguardian.com/environment/article/2024/jul/19/chris-packham-celebrities-outcry-over-severity-just-stop-oil-sentences
"Chris Packham has called for a meeting with the attorney general for England and Wales as he joined a chorus of prominent voices condemning long jail terms for Just Stop Oil protesters.
Speaking after five activists were sentenced to up to five years for planning protests on the M25, the broadcaster and naturalist said: “Be clear, be very, very clear, this is not just about climate activism."
#HumanRights #ukpol
@xinayder It's annoying how a random actor (who owns AI stocks) who brags about the use of AI in that NGO is the only person who Ylva decided to listen to. #chatcontrol
https://medium.com/@josiah.alen.brown/running-a-local-llm-for-dnd-campaign-creation-fd653bceeab9 Apparently, someone uses LLMs for DND campaigns.
As I've said before, someone might pitch something as a "standard", then later on in the cycle, they'll pitch what someone is already doing (which was formally pitched as "standard") as "negligence" and that someone "has to be" even more intrusive.
From what I've seen from a few advocates, there also never seem to be any lines which they decide they won't cross. Maybe, a low rate of accuracy, or violating the rights of innocent people. It is only about more state power / control.
"The police are not capable of investigating crimes unless someone sends them a video of themselves carrying it out."
Keep in mind that in the 21st century, the police has never had more technology and capabilities for investigating crimes.
#chatcontrol
"This is a clear violation of human rights / privacy."
"But, what about Microsoft's algorithm. It has been used for a decade by a few tech companies, that means it must be good."
Ugh... #chatcontrol
It's somewhat annoying how over the past decade, one particular algorithm from one particular U.S. company has been used to sell the idea that surveillance is somehow some magical solution to society's problems. #chatcontrol
As bad actors in this country are consistently producing bullshit, I am specifically addressing it.
It's remarkable how the same bullshit is revived every month where supposedly the "end of the world" over "AI" is here and to "think of the children" over a tiny number of cases at best.
And each time, someone "acts" as if making a "novel" claim. Whether it's promising that "AI" can do anything, or grifting off "AI" hysteria, "AI" remains a magnet for bullshit. #ukpol
@kkarhan @tagesschau Also, Ylva running propaganda for chat control (for her own personal reasons) probably played into the hands of the far right (she was effectively attacking allies).
The AfD even took the time to criticize chat control (but didn't seem to take action against it). It's this sort of dysfunction which is a joke under von der Leyen.
@Lazarou Speaking of tradition.
Upper house reform might be an interesting idea. For instance, only a part of an elected house could be replaced in any one election, and / or they could have staggered terms to better check and balance the lower house. It would help avoid the sort of "high stakes" battles which populists thrive on. Could also be an area to experiment with a different voting system.
Courts could have a bigger role for enforcing a set of rules which the government shouldn't violate. If it's the advisory role of the Lords, maybe advisory expert committees? I dunno.
While the Lords are touted as a "check and balance", they rubber-stamped a lot under Johnson.
https://libertyinvestigates.org.uk/articles/met-police-computers-access-dangerous-facial-recognition-search-engine/
"Scotland Yard has banned officers from using a controversial facial recognition search engine described as “invasive and dangerous” by MPs after it was accessed thousands of times from Metropolitan Police computers"
"Pimeyes – a website that allows users to upload photos and identify where images of an individual appear elsewhere on the internet – was visited from Met Police computers 2,337 times in just one three month period, according to a freedom of information request submitted by Liberty Investigates. Unlike Met-approved facial recognition tools, Pimeyes could be accessed by any officer or staff member without official records of searches or safeguards around whose photos are being searched."
#privacy #ukpol #FaceRecognition
https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/issue/help-us-hold-them-to-their-promises/ I was wondering what Liberty had to say about the new British government and there you go.
In general, I'd like to avoid things like "someone being locked up in the mental hospital", if possible, and to expand avenues for getting them out of there.
Software Engineer. Psy / Tech / Sex Science Enthusiast. Controversial?
Free Expression. Human rights / Civil Liberties. Anime. Liberal.