Show newer

@glynmoody

"Data from the Internet Watch Foundation (IWF) indicates that in 2022, nearly 200,000 webpages were confirmed as containing CSAM, having links to the imagery or advertising it (an increase of nine per cent compared to 2021)."

Are these actual images or like spam links?

Olives boosted

web.archive.org/web/2024010603
web.archive.org/web/2023111400

The next (an internet policy event hosted by the U.N.) is being held in Saudi Arabia, a country known for brutal repression and chopping critical journalists up into tiny little pieces.

Talk about out of touch.

Olives boosted

I don't typically write for . However, some of the puritanical anti porn takes (seems to mainly be cops with their "hunches", and basically asserting that porn must be bad, even though there is no actual evidence of this) are getting so detached from reality that I have to comment on it briefly. No, not on the fediverse, thankfully.

As for the other bits, there is a very obvious reason why online crime would increase during Covid. That is, because, uh, everyone is online and there isn't a whole lot else to do...? Also, locking up populations is not exactly great for mental health, and the mental health system was even driven to the brink of collapse (probably depriving mental health resources from many). And remember, that mental health, or services for that matter most likely, don't just spring to normality immediately, just because a situation has been lifted.

I've even seen allegations the "Conservative Party" has historically explored trying to dissuade people from using mental health services in order to save money. Crime (including child abuse) tends to be associated with poverty, it can be reasonably inferred that the economic devastation wrought by Brexit might be associated with an increase in crime as well.

Also, covid style lockdowns might deprive individuals from social inclusion.

So, right off the bat, we have far more compelling explanations.

There are other potential variables as well, such as potentially compromised international co-operation due to the "special military operation" involving Russia and Ukraine. Also, a lot of these modern platforms, when you think about it, are not really that old (especially, when you count uptake). Even the Web as a whole is not that old, when you think of the world in decades, rather than rapid yearly cycles.

Also, the folks over at the Home Office might periodically practically alter what constitutes an image based crime. Anecdotally, I've also noticed quite a few "he did something in 2020" type crimes being reported in British news articles, this might also bias numbers (I think that cops going out of their way to chase old low level image based crimes (i.e. viewing) is probably not the best use of their resources, although I don't know a whole lot about this particular phenomena).

That's not all someone could come up with, of course.

qoto.org/@olives/1115160112466 I've written about the more particular subject of how porn is not really some big evil (and even sort of how it intersects with human rights... sort of) before. Also, why a lot of the words I just wrote (in the above paragraphs) shouldn't matter for not engaging in censorship (or invading someone's privacy).

Also, platforms are typically becoming *more* censorious in terms of porn, or porn themes, as time goes by. That is typically what we see. So, either diversity actually reduces crime, or it is unrelated. Take your pick. It also calls into question the more censorship angle... It's also an annoyingly zero sum initiative, it's contentious, controversial, and wastes a lot of resources chattering about something that isn't going to work in the real world.

I've written about what might actually be helpful, although it'd be hard for me to immediately come up with something for the U.K. Typically, it comes down to educational initiatives (or enforcement action to deal with online predators?).

It's honestly quite upsetting that someone would ignore *literally everything else* going on in the country to peddle a "I hate porn" agenda. Not surprising at all. But, nonetheless, disappointing.

@GGMcBG @_L1vY_ Boss. How high do you want me to turn up the dehumanization dial.

@kunev @_L1vY_ There's also Mr. Book Ban who likes to grandstand.

Olives boosted

cbc.ca/news/canada/british-col Canadian police tricked 150 people from the Kurdish community into handing over samples of their DNA by pretending to be marketers, offering them free samples of tea and swabbing them.

Finding a horrible person (murderer) was used as a justification for this.

@kkarhan@social.tchncs.de @pluralistic I think a privacy law would be preferable to messing around with people's rights in ways that are very harmful (and imo probably won't really help).

qoto.org/@olives/1117481841162
Incidentally, this isn't that similar an issue, but it kind of reminds me of the U.K.'s mental health system collapsing (during Covid), then them trying to blame social issues on "porn" (the tired scapegoat). Avoiding the most important points. Another line of reasoning of mine is that Brexit drives poor economic conditions which in turn is associated with more crime.

The porn! The porn!!

They latch onto some random thing but manage to miss the point.

In a nutshell, Blumenthal engages in grandstanding.

In 2009, as Attorney General, he grandstanded about former criminals using a social network, even if they weren't committing any crimes.

In 2017 / 2018, he was grandstanding about prostitutes on Backpage.

In 2019 / 2020, he was grandstanding about EARN IT. Even though it's an absolutely terrible idea.

In 2022 / 2023 / 2024, he was grandstanding about KOSA. He seems to be talking particularly bad nonsense about "AI" too, so better watch out for him.

I'm sure you could find more instances in the Blumenthal collection. What does it all have in common? Well, his ideas are unconstitutional (and harmful).

Olives boosted

You might remember that I dug back to something like 2009, and even back then, I could catch sight of him farting in the direction of the First Amendment.

Olives  
Whenever I hear about Blumenthal, it involves him wanting to do something that is very clearly unconstitutional.
Olives boosted

reclaimthenet.org/italy-popula

"In what can be seen as an open clampdown against the freedoms and rights of social media influencers, the Italian Regulatory Authority of Telecommunications (AGCOM) has announced that people with a following exceeding 1,000,000 will now be legally considered as “producers of audio-visual content” within the law, placing them on the same legal footing as publishers."

I suspect this language will cause a certain amount of confusion as to what a "publisher" is.

"Under the new regulations, influencers are compelled to clearly distinguish sponsored content and ads, with penalties reaching up to a quarter-million euros for non-compliance. Violations concerning child protection could warrant penalties exceeding half a million euros. Even non-commercial content produced by influencers must adhere to anti-discrimination regulations and uphold various standards currently imposed on traditional media creators, such as abstention from disseminating “misinformation,” “hate speech,” or promotion of “harmful” behavior like excessive alcohol consumption."

Sounds troublesome for free expression.

@marcellinusme @ionica I'm looking at that picture and just imagining that guy walking into a wall or something.

This is the sort of nonsense that grandstanding gets you.

Olives  
https://themessenger.com/news/florida-school-district-dictionaries-escambia-county-sex-ed "A school district in Florida has taken dictionaries off ...
Olives boosted

themessenger.com/news/florida-
"A school district in Florida has taken dictionaries off its libraries' shelves because of fears they violate the state's recent legislation on books depicting or describing sexual conduct."

I don't know whether to laugh at this because of the sheer absurdity of it or complain about it. Both?

Olives boosted

reason.com/2024/01/15/the-newl

"Last week, in response to a Freedom of Information Act request by Houston lawyer Matthew Zorn, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) revealed the rationale for its August 2023 recommendation that the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) move marijuana from Schedule I to Schedule III of the Controlled Substances Act."

Also, while it's easy to understand why they might be frustrated with the other party leading them on, then screwing them over at the last minute at the referendum, I suspect that other party would just go on about how they're victims of some totalitarian regime, if she did this.

Olives  
https://reclaimthenet.org/michelle-rowland-tries-to-justify-new-censorship-law Misinformation is a very vague and nebulous term.
Olives boosted
Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.