Show newer

@alecmuffett There was a small group of people who pushed Mastodon away from implementing *search* of all things for many years.

One of the OSBs was also an assault on small sites.

One can question whether Zuckerberg's move here is serious, but one also has to be wary of inadvertently giving a defence to censorship.

Show thread

The OSBs are an assault on free expression. The German NetzDG has long been panned for driving over-enforcement from firms. I saw an estimate that 99% of removals were for legitimate content. German media authorities have been known to push for removals of swathes of legitimate content.

Show thread

While it's unclear to me whether the DMA drives censorship, it's very likely the DSA does. Masnick criticized it, noting it's potentially broad sweep. These two laws were passed in the same package.

If we include country level laws, there are even more.

Show thread

article19.org/resources/europe European Court of Human Rights finds that holding someone liable for comments made by others on their page is a violation of their freedom of expression.

It was criticized by civil society as likely to lead to takedowns of legitimate content (i.e. journalism). It was noted that comparatively speaking, terroristic content is very rare. There was a recent case in the U.S. Supreme Court (Twitter v Taamneh) which touched upon similar issues.

Show thread

"we are puzzled by Mark Zuckerberg’s assertion that Europe has enacted an ‘ever-increasing number of laws institutionalizing censorship’."
"Europe" has done that. TERREG, DSA, and more.

The Terror Regulation (TERREG) demands rapid takedowns of "terroristic content".

Show thread

article19.org/resources/meta-p
There are people who seem very confused about how to respond to Zuckerberg here, particularly regarding whether this is a serious attempt to deal with issues pertaining to free expression or not.

Apparently, people don't like acronyms.

apnews.com/article/germany-bir
"Under German law, works of art enjoy stronger and longer-lasting intellectual property protections than consumer products."

While it's technically the TAKE IT DOWN Act, I'm going to write it as Take It Down in the tag to make it easier to read.

apnews.com/article/brazil-supr
"A Brazilian Supreme Court justice on Friday ordered the suspension of video-sharing platform in the South American nation"

Someone complaining about "woke" is someone essentially complaining about a vague and amorphous sense of political correctness, not about an actual concrete ideology.

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.