Show newer

I don't know how well hashtags work on fediverse. Here's one for .

Olives  
Good morning, Britain. Might I draw your attention to an awfully dreadful instrument of repression which is making it's way through Westminister? ...

It'd be cool if Mastodon implemented the ability to schedule posts.

Writing to your MEPs, writing to your national governments, and getting others to do so as well would greatly assist in taking down this bill.

Olives  
https://chatcontrol.wtf Oppose the fascist E.U. spying / censorship bill. It won't stop (probably already isn't stopping) just at real abuse / expl...

eff.org/deeplinks/2023/05/inte U.S. Supreme Court declines to censor the Internet by uprooting a foundational law protecting freedom of expression and innovation, Section 230.

The U.S. Supreme Court has opted to leave Section 230 alone in Gonzalez and Taamneh (although, they didn't explicitly rule on it). A victory for free expression.

Olives boosted

Anti-democratic legislation attacks our ability to engage in public debate.

From the Public Order Act to the Online Safety Bill, the government is leveraging powers to contain protest from IRL to URL.

Online platforms are public spaces for democratic discussion. The Online Safety Bill could threaten the circulation of images, videos or text concerning public protests on social media.

#OnlineSafetyBill #censorship #freespeech #ukpolitics

openrightsgroup.org/blog/onlin

The War of Drugs. A war which never ceases to find novel ways to violate your rights.

youtube.com/watch?v=wJUXLqNHCa
jstor.org/stable/resrep45154.1
techdirt.com/2016/06/21/custom
techdirt.com/2019/06/13/new-ha
techdirt.com/2020/09/03/appeal
techdirt.com/2023/02/10/texas-
Not satisfied with how over-zealous drug enforcement has been an instrument for civil rights violations, lawmakers have concocted a new way to violate your rights...

Introducing the Cooper Davis Act.

eff.org/deeplinks/2023/04/your
This bill would hold platforms liable if they were to fail to report illegal drug sales which they should have "reasonably known about".

For practical purposes, it'd likely lead to platforms making reports in any situation which vaguely refers to drugs, past drug usage, or treatment, thereby violating the First Amendment rights of those concerned.

It's not clear it'd have an impact on drug sales. War on Drugs type tactics never really do.

qoto.org/@olives/1103819833219
qoto.org/@olives/1103812820158
qoto.org/@olives/1103832931767
Like with bills, it's likely this bill would be further expanded to encompass even more things.

edri.org/our-work/commissioner
Also, while the "CSAM reporting scheme" might not be as harmful as this bill, even that bill has led to people being falsely accused of being child predators by platforms.

We should be sceptical of plans to expand that as well.

He's awful at free expression. The new Twitter is more censorious than the old one, except when it comes to allowing odious figures back on.

He panders too much to odious figures.

He bows to authoritarian governments like Turkey. In fact, he hasn't rejected a single government request from any government, unlike the previous administration who did push back. So much for ending the antics of the previous administration.

His tech stack is melting down worse than a volcano about to erupt.

Show thread

What's impressive about the new Twitter, is that the new guy has so systemically destroyed anything which might have provided the site value, that even someone who might have been his fan might just say nah.

Btw, banning mannequins which resemble minors (even if it doesn't resemble an *actual minor*) and are likely to be used for sex is unconstitutional (it violates the First Amendment).

There are also already laws to handle other scenarios. Also, didn't right wing mobs harass a foundation in 2020 which worked with a manufacturer to come up with a code of ethics?

I'm also struggling to imagine a blanket prohibition is going to be particularly helpful here.

Olives boosted

The UK slumped down in the global index of free expression to being partially open.

The Online Safety Bill joins a patchwork of anti-democratic legislation and policies that have a chilling effect. Prior restraint censorship will be particularly damaging.

#OnlineSafetyBill #censorship #freespeech #ukpolitics

theguardian.com/politics/2023/

Olives boosted

The effect of the anti-democratic Public Order Act was seen during the coronation.

The Online Safety Bill takes the attack on public debate further: blocking content that shows protest from social media feeds.

ORG's Head of Comms, Pam Cowburn, explains more. #OnlineSafetyBill #censorship #freespeech #ukpolitics

openrightsgroup.org/blog/onlin

Good morning, Britain.

Might I draw your attention to an awfully dreadful instrument of repression which is making it's way through Westminister?

That is the OSB.

Yes. *That* Westminister. That awful place responsible for getting people arrested for protesting against the monarchy, who wanted to put protesters on ankle bracelets, who want to deport illegal migrants to a country with a terrible human rights record, Rwanda, and who passed a bill to give MI5 agents a license to kill and rape.

This deplorable bill throws around a bunch of rosy, and utopian words. Under the surface, however, lies an authoritarian monstrosity, so complex and incoherent, that even the MPs and Lords sitting in Parliament don't fully understand it.

Through a long and rather convoluted structure, this bill enshrines shaming, harassing, and repressing people for their kinks into law, by breathing a breath of fresh air into obscenity laws which haven't played a real role in quite a few years.

Even viewing porn will require you to provide your ID, so criminals can hack the database, or trick you into handing over your ID by imitating the ID provider, to blackmail and extort you. If you have a humiliation kink, rejoice, you are about to be in for a very exciting experience.

This bill also encourages platforms to tackle undefined "risks", which is presumably whatever the government of the day is having a moral panic over, and if they get it wrong, they could face civil liability. That means bye-bye free expression and hello repression.

That's not all. There is also a clause which allows a new government agency to issue notices to companies to bar them from using end-to-end encryption and to spy on all your messages. Just as the Stasi and Big Brother might.

Will it at least make the Internet safer? Oh honey, you think this is to make the Internet safer? This is yet another tool from a bunch of old fossils who could never get past the fact they can't control everything, and who yearn for the days of television and legacy media when no one could whisper a word on a large scale without their say so.

This is only the beginning. Parliament could amend this law at any time, and even have a mechanism to rush through changes with next to no deliberation called statutory instruments. Anytime there is a moral panic over nothing, you will feel an immeasurable amount of pain and frustration.

Alternatively, the Digital and Culture Minister, a figure who is known for being very politically and emotionally motivated, could show up to interfere in social media companies at any time. The person in this role used to be Nadine Dorries. It is now someone slightly better, although still not what you'd call a reasonable person.

Expect every petty partisan matter to be considered. Illegal migration? Expect random photographs of boats on the channel to be censored.

petition.parliament.uk/petitio You can oppose it by signing this petition and writing to MPs / Lords to oppose this abomination and getting as many people as possible to also do this.

xbiz.com/news/272937/german-po Shocking abuse of power by a minor bureaucrat.

pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/314325
pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/310420
Nor is it clear porn is having such a dramatically awful effect on minors... That we have to violate people's most basic rights like this.

Don't let facts get in the way of a good moral panic?

Olives boosted

Fancy authoritarianism through the back door? Well, the Online Safety Bill does just that. It gives Ofcom the power to require companies to scan our messages.

So we hit the streets of London with a message to Parliament: Don't Scan Me!

✊ Join our campaign: action.openrightsgroup.org/don

#DontScanMe #StopTheSpyClause #OnlineSafetyBill #ukpolitics #privacy

Olives boosted

Today the government’s anti-democratic mission is seen clearly. As well as suppressing dissent through draconian anti-protest laws, the Met used live facial recognition surveillance during the coronation.

These are the tactics of authoritarian regimes.

In a democracy, protest is a fundamental right. #protest #coronation #policing #humanrights

time.com/6277591/anti-monarchy

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.