Show newer

While I agree with him on so-called censorship from the government being harmful, it feels a lot like he is in this Silicon Valley bubble where he doesn't seem to notice how aggravating Big Tech over-moderation has been for a lot of people over the past five years.

Olives  
https://www.techdirt.com/2023/12/26/substack-turns-on-its-nazis-welcome-sign/ I honestly find posts like this quite fascinating, as Mike didn't alw...

*Not recently at least.

If you go back over a decade, you might see him going "woah, too far" to Paypal over... Yup. Porn related censorship.

Show thread

techdirt.com/2023/12/26/substa I honestly find posts like this quite fascinating, as Mike didn't always bend over backwards like this to excuse people attacking sites over their moderation policies supposedly being too permissive.

reason.com/2023/12/21/substack For instance, here is a more principled take. It's not anything particularly shocking, it's just a pretty traditional take on free speech. She's also not someone who is a fan of the "War on Porn" and has written a fair bit about that.

Of the two, Elizabeth is naturally the one who is far more correct, and Mike is the one who doesn't understand how any of this works. Perhaps, Substack is not the best example, as they're more selective, but it isn't as if there haven't been examples which had porn on them.

Once a site gets to a certain scale, and they're chasing vague conceptions of "harm" in Silicon Valley, it seems that it leads to a whole bunch of nonsense, and ignoring that is simply to ignore the majority of what is going on in the world. Mike keeps losing sight of that and that is his problem. He doesn't even attempt to address this, and that is why his arguments come off as so hollow.

It's worth mentioning that whether it's sexual expression being removed by a platform, or anything else for that matter, I don't think I have ever seen a case where Mike has gone "woah there, too far". Not. One. Case. Not recently at least.

If Mike at least showed up occasionally to be like, "Alright, you have gone too far in this area", then I might have given him more of the benefit of the doubt, however, Elizabeth looks like the adult in the room here.

web.archive.org/web/2023122607

"CPT urges Romania to take urgent action to improve living conditions and treatment for patients in psychiatric establishments "

"The most dramatic situation was found at the Pădureni-Grajduri Psychiatric and Safety Measures Hospital, where 104 patients had to share a bed with another patient. Patients were crammed into dormitories with almost all the floor space taken up by their beds; for example, in the admission ward, a room of 24m² was accommodating 18 patients in nine beds. For the CPT, the warehousing conditions of persons with mental disorders and intellectual disabilities found in this hospital may well be considered as amounting to inhuman and degrading treatment."

Also, from the report:

"The delegation visited the civil psychiatric hospitals of Bălăceanca, Botoșani, Obregia (Bucharest) and Socola (Iaşi). In all the hospitals visited, patients spoke positively about the staff, particularly nursing staff. However, instances of alleged ill treatment and verbal abuse by staff were received in all the hospitals visited apart from Obregia. In particular, on the male acute ward of Botoșani Psychiatric Clinic the delegation received numerous allegations of patients being ill-treated (punched, slapped, pushed, and shouted at) by auxiliary staff."

Olives boosted

"ECPAT USA" have renamed themselves to "PACT", it seems.

So, if some org with that name shows up supporting some censorious "save the children" bill in the future, then you know it's them.

People keep learning that putting internet connected "smart cameras" in their bedrooms is a bad idea...

Complaining about someone generating something "offensive" using a "copyrighted character" fundamentally misunderstands what copyright was even intended for...

It's worth remembering that C3P's definition of "child porn" is very broad to the point of being useless. So, if someone is sitting in a room fully clothed, that can be "child porn" in their eyes (yes, there have been recorded cases like that). Whatever their reasoning is there, it is silly to scream at someone for not removing a particular item like that from a site on the spot.

In one case, they appeared to be uploading the images themselves to a search engine, then reporting them to get them taken down (even though they were only transiently cached in the search thing for minutes at a time). This is extremely problematic as it creates room for scandal over nothing.

boingboing.net/2023/12/18/if-y

"One study showed that high frequency of ejaculation (21+ times/month) correlated with a 20% reduction in prostate cancer risk compared to lower frequency of ejaculation (4-7 times/month)."

It's also worth mentioning that "cartoon porn" was mentioned as one of the top searches on one of these sites, and I particularly have free expression concerns there from would-be censors.

Show thread

I've always found those location tracking apps to be creepy, even when it has an apparent legitimate use to it.

The best cases I can think of is like Google Maps (and I don't know how privacy friendly Google is) and like Pokémon Go which is a gimmick game (which loves microtransactions).

Meredith Whittaker  
Persistent surveillance sold as a cure for loneliness (alienation, isolation, etc) is, IMO, one of the central marketing narratives of the surveill...

While potential accuracy of AI translations are an obvious point of concern, if you happen to be a troll known to vandalize translations, Katrina, then maybe you should sit this one out.

bleepingcomputer.com/news/secu

"Today, the Akira ransomware gang claimed that it breached the network of Nissan Australia, the Australian division of Japanese car maker Nissan.

In a new entry added to the operation's date leak blog on December 22, Akira says that its operators allegedly stole around 100GB of documents from the automaker's systems.

The attackers have threatened to leak sensitive business and client data online, as ransom negotiations with Nissan failed after the company either refused to engage or pay the ransom."

The same country which insists that nothing could possibly go wrong from getting companies to retain far more data than they need.

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.