Olives @olives@qoto.org

I wish there was a way to collapse long threads in the "home feed".

Judging by the notifications (quite a few have poured in now, including follows and replies), there appears to be some degree of interaction with other instances now.

Posts pouring into the "home feed" now, although older ones.

I see there's been quite a bit of progress.

https://reason.com/2024/02/22/proposition-e-would-make-it-easier-for-police-to-surveil-san-francisco/

"On March 5, San Franciscans will have the opportunity to vote on a ballot measure that would decide whether or not to make them into guinea pigs for surveillance experiments by the San Francisco Police Department (SFPD)."

"In other words, the SFPD could roll out an unapproved method of surveillance, and it would have free rein to operate within the city for up to a year before ever having to ask city officials for permission. And until the city passes a statute that specifically forbids it—that is, forbidding a technology that is by that point already in use—then the SFPD can keep using it indefinitely."

#privacy

The progress appears to have sped up a bit.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y8OnoxKotPQ I think this video about microservices is very fitting right now, lol.

I hope Mastodon doesn't have to sync every post in order to function properly. What sort of incompetent buffoon designs a software like this...

I'm told that Mastodon is a notoriously fussy software, so I suppose that explains the current issues with stability here.

There was a burst of 404 errors appearing for a bit.

I saw part of that name and misread it as Assange Island, lol.

I'm seeing some likes trickling into "notifications" but replies are not.

I think it is likely the "home feed" and "notifications" are currently broken.

Outwards federation appears to be broken.

Apparently, there was a bit of a ruckus about spam.

Maybe, if a new account posts the same thing five times, then maybe, it could be prevented from continuing to do so for a few hours.

That said, "anti-bot" measures can often be more effective at preventing actual humans from using a site.

https://www.wired.com/story/blueskys-future-is-social-medias-past/ "Bluesky is boring and uninteresting" is not an inaccurate take.

If you're not aware, this instance went down for maintenance for a while, so if it seemed quiet, that is why.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1efOs0BsE0g I suppose that means this video talking about them just tossing him to the sharks is a bit less accurate now then. It's still a good one.