Show newer

wapo.st/4aqzJmn
"Key federal lawmakers Sunday unveiled a sweeping proposal that would for the first time give consumers broad rights to control how tech companies like Google, Meta and TikTok use their personal data, a major breakthrough in the decades-long fight to adopt national online protections."

"it is seen as “complementary” to other bills on child safety"
How about dropping the unconstitutional censorship bill (which actually undermines privacy)?

I see a proposal for a new U.S. federal law has been unveiled.

CenDemTech  
CDT is encouraged to see a constructive bipartisan discussion draft of a #privacy bill from two key leaders, Senators Cantwell and McMorris. A comp...
Olives boosted

CDT is encouraged to see a constructive bipartisan discussion draft of a #privacy bill from two key leaders, Senators Cantwell and McMorris.

A comprehensive federal privacy law is long overdue.  We hope that Congress will quickly turn to moving a bill through the legislative process and look forward to working with all stakeholders in finally getting privacy legislation passed. commerce.senate.gov/2024/4/com

For the record, I prefer to make more principled / scientific arguments, rather than talk about a particular group of religious fundamentalists who like to misrepresent science. I find them irritating.

Show thread

Well, to give an example of being over-specific (I didn't before and I probably should have), "They are good people who wouldn't do that" is better than fixating on something silly like "thought crimes" which don't really matter and serve as more of a distraction.

Maybe, I'm just quibbling over language here, although I've seen a misuse of it like that before.

group hit by Google's algorithm.

ARTICLE 19  
We are dismayed by Google's suspension of our ads account over alleged 'unacceptable business practices'. Despite numerous attempts for clarificat...
Olives boosted

We are dismayed by Google's suspension of our ads account over alleged 'unacceptable business practices'.

Despite numerous attempts for clarification and appeal, silence from Google persists. Our work defending freedom of expression is hindered.

We call on Google to reverse this decision and adhere to its own standards. article19.org/resources/google

@article19 @article19_eca

Hi Article 19.

nichegamer.com/dlsite-temporar

There is a very concerning attack on freedom of expression which might be of interest to you. It involves a private actor attacking vast swathes of art / sexual expression (involving non-existent people). It should be permissible by the First Amendment (although, this isn't America) and the local law in Japan (and the Constitution, Article 19 / 21 of which protects free expression[1]).

A few of the articles on this site can be a bit on the conservative side but this one is fairly good.

Perhaps relevant:
qoto.org/@olives/1121667525290
qoto.org/@olives/1118889463563

1 Something which is often brought up is the Constitution there, examples of which include:

"Article 19. Freedom of thought and conscience shall not be violated."

"Article 21. Freedom of assembly and association as well as speech, press and all other forms of expression are guaranteed.
No censorship shall be maintained, nor shall the secrecy of any means of communication be violated."

From what I've seen, this right is not absolute. If someone deliberately posts non-consensual porn of someone (someone who actually exists), for instance, it wouldn't protect them from the law. However, that is a very different kind of case.

Olives boosted

reason.com/2024/04/04/federal-
"Is it cruel and unusual to subject an incarcerated person to sleep deprivation for years? That's a question it has taken federal courts more than a decade to answer.

On March 22, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 5th Circuit reinstated Texas inmate Michael Garrett's 11-year-long-and-still-running lawsuit against the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, finding that a lower district court had repeatedly and incorrectly subjected him to a higher bar than it should have to prove that being afforded less than four hours of sleep a night violated his constitutional rights."

I see the ACLU was fighting with MasterCard over the company suppressing free expression. Cool.

They've even filed a complaint with the FTC.

Olives boosted

The point of strong safeguards is usually to avoid going down the path of "fuzzy algorithms which auto report people to the police".

Olives  
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2024/03/eff-asks-oregon-supreme-court-not-limit-fourth-amendemtn-rights-based-terms "EFF signed on to an amicus brief...
Olives boosted

theintercept.com/2024/03/16/sa
"Two lawsuits will move forward against the federal government over the FBI’s warrantless search of hundreds of safe deposit boxes, a court ruled this week. Last year, in a related case, a federal appellate judge called the FBI’s raid “egregious” and “outrageous.”"

Warning: Site might contain images of injured people in Gaza. These are for a different article.

@freemo The tickers on the posts have vanished.

For instance, under the username on a post, there might have been a yellow bar containing a picture of a green concoction in a test tube next to the name qoto.org

That take on free expression (and the context it links to) still applies.

Olives  
I'd say that, as a rule of thumb, if someone isn't bothering other people (to be clear, "I am offended" does not count, lol), then I'd say that peo...

washingtonpost.com/technology/
"The leaders of two key congressional committees are nearing an agreement on a national framework aimed at protecting Americans’ personal data online, a significant milestone that could put lawmakers closer than ever to passing legislation that has eluded them for decades, according to a person familiar with the matter, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the talks."

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eating_y
Ideally, they would be eating their own dog food. A tool with a high standard of privacy would be the second best option.

Show thread
Olives boosted

veilid.com/ Serious question. Why would someone have this ultra privacy project but then have like just a Discord (which isn't exactly great for privacy)?

Olives boosted

reclaimthenet.org/major-league
"Technology developed by a company called NEC has been utilized to introduce biometric ticketing on the opening day of the 2024 Major League Baseball (MLB) season. This pilot was undertaken at four designated baseball parks, including Minute Maid Park in Houston"

Olives boosted

edri.org/our-work/new-eu-healt
"After almost two years of legislative negotiations, lawmakers from the European Parliament and EU member states have agreed on a compromise for the new European Health Data Space (EHDS) last week.

Unfortunately, the EHDS compromise will expose everyone’s medical records to unnecessary security and privacy risks in the name of research and “innovation”. It mandates every hospital and every doctor to share the private medical data from every single patient—for the purpose of secondary use, i.e. unrelated to the patient’s treatment—with a national agency, the so-called health data access body. Exactly how and what patient data is going to be shared may vary from member state to member state."

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.