Show newer

The E.U.'s approach towards "AI" was another one that might involve censorship.

One of the OSBs was also an assault on small sites.

One can question whether Zuckerberg's move here is serious, but one also has to be wary of inadvertently giving a defence to censorship.

Show thread

The OSBs are an assault on free expression. The German NetzDG has long been panned for driving over-enforcement from firms. I saw an estimate that 99% of removals were for legitimate content. German media authorities have been known to push for removals of swathes of legitimate content.

Show thread

While it's unclear to me whether the DMA drives censorship, it's very likely the DSA does. Masnick criticized it, noting it's potentially broad sweep. These two laws were passed in the same package.

If we include country level laws, there are even more.

Show thread

It was criticized by civil society as likely to lead to takedowns of legitimate content (i.e. journalism). It was noted that comparatively speaking, terroristic content is very rare. There was a recent case in the U.S. Supreme Court (Twitter v Taamneh) which touched upon similar issues.

Show thread

"we are puzzled by Mark Zuckerberg’s assertion that Europe has enacted an ‘ever-increasing number of laws institutionalizing censorship’."
"Europe" has done that. TERREG, DSA, and more.

The Terror Regulation (TERREG) demands rapid takedowns of "terroristic content".

Show thread

Apparently, people don't like acronyms.

While it's technically the TAKE IT DOWN Act, I'm going to write it as Take It Down in the tag to make it easier to read.

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.