It's remarkable how claims as to the accuracy of "PhotoDNA" seem to keep coming from the creator (who is known to be fairly activist) and not from any sort of external assessment.
Also, didn't a former Facebook employee say that there's a NDA which prevents companies from talking about false positives? #chatcontrol
Reminder about my updated dive into bad faith conflations of fiction and reality (i.e. talking about a fictional scenario in similar tones as to if it was actually real in a bad faith manner), including for AI and VR, although not limited to those two. #GenAI
@liberties Your website appears to be having difficulties in being indexed by the Internet Archive's Wayback Machine.
There is an impossible to dismiss GDPR notice on pages which have been captured.
I don't necessarily dislike the idea of "keep up" legal standards for speech on large social networks. I think executing it would be tricky though.
I have a few worries here:
1) There is a fair bit of supreme court precedent against compelled speech. Prohibitions on compelled speech are very important for protecting someone's right to free expression. Undermining that would be troublesome.
2) Some proposals (and the Texas law) are not content neutral. They discriminate against some forms of content. Off the top of my head, there is a vague clause which could be used by bad faith actors to target sexual expression. This is not in line with the First Amendment. That is worrying.
3) While this is probably less of a problem with a U.S. based proposal, internationally, you might have one country tell a company to take something down, and another tell them to keep it up.
4) State power.
https://www.techdirt.com/2023/12/28/the-ny-times-lawsuit-against-openai-would-open-up-the-ny-times-to-all-sorts-of-lawsuits-should-it-win/ Now, a copyright take more favorable to "AI" (although, I prefer the idea of someone running something without the OpenAI middle-man, still).
https://apnews.com/article/university-wisconsin-la-crosse-porn-fired-2bcaa8e751be50ebe83f8e1ed1a7cc32 University of Wisconsin fires chancellor for appearing in porn film... Puritans...
"Gow told The Associated Press in a phone interview Thursday morning that regents had discovered that he and his wife, former UW-La Crosse professor Carmen Wilson, had been producing and appearing in pornographic videos.
He maintained that he never mentioned UW-La Crosse or his role at the university in any of the videos and the firing violated his free speech rights.
“My wife and I live in a country where we have a First Amendment,” he said. “We’re dealing with consensual adult sexuality. The regents are overreacting. They’re certainly not adhering to their own commitment to free speech or the First Amendment.”"
#BandaiNamco Film Works Teases Original ‘#SpaceBattleshipYamato’ Films 4K Releases With New Promo for Theatrical Run http://dlvr.it/T0jPfH
Love Live! Nijigasaki High School Idol Club - Kasumi Nakasu 1/7 Scale Figure - Still Available!
🛑https://meccha-japan.com/en/figures/112389-figure-kasumi-nakasu-nijigasaki-high-school-idol-club-love-live.html
#LoveLive #KasumiNakasu
There are a lot, lot, lot of examples. Some might get flashy articles. Many don't. Censorship that is the most obvious to just about everyone in this regard is just the tip of the iceberg.
https://www.vice.com/en/article/v7mzpj/pornhub-content-deleted-verification
"Before the purge that disappeared more than 75 percent of content on the platform, Pornhub hosted a lot of videos and photos that weren’t humans having sex. There were full-length movies, memes, and video game playthroughs that you might see on a non-adult site like Twitch, but there was also a ton of animation, 3D renderings, audio erotica, music videos, fanfic from furries and bronies, and stop-motion animation like LEGO minifigs fucking."
One example of what "collateral damage" can look like, oh, that is only one of many examples. Isn't it fun to have people randomly giving you the middle finger? #DSA
Here's one which flew under the radar in mid-2023:
https://ecnl.org/news/ecnl-access-now-and-eff-joint-statement-extended-reality-xr-technologies
@ecnl, @eff and Access Now wrote to the European Commission to urge them to protect #privacy (and it seems free expression too) when it comes to the #metaverse.
https://www.vice.com/en/article/v7mzpj/pornhub-content-deleted-verification
"Before the purge that disappeared more than 75 percent of content on the platform, Pornhub hosted a lot of videos and photos that weren’t humans having sex. There were full-length movies, memes, and video game playthroughs that you might see on a non-adult site like Twitch, but there was also a ton of animation, 3D renderings, audio erotica, music videos, fanfic from furries and bronies, and stop-motion animation like LEGO minifigs fucking."
From 2020.
I'm concerned that their ideologues as it were are going to go around invading people's privacy in order to feed into some "algorithm" to do a load of number crunching on (probably for questionable gains) with some vague idea like this relating to health.
https://www.dtu.dk/english/news/all-news/artificial-intelligence-can-predict-events-in-peoples-lives?id=49c0a5da-0ef9-4222-8f59-aff35888a2ba But, did they think about their #privacy, when building this... Questionable thing? Also, at first glance, it appears to have told us things we already knew.
https://reason.com/2023/12/27/british-teen-gets-potential-life-sentence-for-grand-theft-auto-vi-hack/ Reason comments on *that* incident.
Software Engineer. Psy / Tech / Sex Science Enthusiast. Controversial?
Free Expression. Human rights / Civil Liberties. Anime. Liberal.