Some people think ChatGPT has a place writing things like news briefs, stuff written to a specific style and tone and, y'know, kinda boring.
So Science did a study.
ChatGPT failed.
Why? It got stuff wrong. "Also, extensive editing for hyperbole was needed." https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/can-chatgpt-help-science-writers
@beebrookshire
"However, it tended to sacrifice accuracy for simplicity. "
In fairness, much like every lay reporter ever handed the science beat on any magazine or TV network.
