Follow

@uebernerd
Yes, but:
1) there should be some robust system for identifying and archiving articles (in case of a blog-site shutdown, or similar);
2) In my opinion, the peer-review system is ineffective and biased, however, I think that without it, process would be much more (status) biased and vulnerable to fraud, corruption, conflict of interests and so on.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.