Show newer

Majority of nation's spike in requests to ban books from libraries came from just 11 individuals.

Democracy, amirite?

washingtonpost.com/education/2

Hey look, you can now view (and download) the ToC and Chapter 1 from my forthcoming modeling book. This chapter provides something of a philosophical grounding before we get into the more technical weeds in the subsequent chapters.

press.princeton.edu/books/pape

Hey look, you can now view (and download) the ToC and Chapter 1 from my forthcoming modeling book. This chapter provides something of a philosophical grounding before we get into the more technical weeds in the subsequent chapters.

press.princeton.edu/books/pape

It is quite the thing to present whatever this is as a privacy feature.

Social Media personality Caryn Marjorie launched CarynAI, a GPT-4 powered chatbot version of herself that her fans can pay $1/minute to talk to

On the one hand: she’s on track to earn $5M this year

On the other hand: she’s had to flee her home and hire security because some fans are upset about the chatbot

washingtonpost.com/technology/

Minor life goal: solve NYT Saturday crossword in under 10 minutes. Closing in on it.

Job! I'm hiring a 2-yr postdoc at
UCM for Fall 2023 to model the cultural evolution of complex social identities and associated signaling strategies, in collaboration w
Adrian Bell. More info here. Please reach out with any questions! aprecruit.ucmerced.edu/JPF0156

Finally, a solution to the unfairness of authorship ordering in scientific papers! 😂

"Every Author as First Author"

arxiv.org/abs/2304.01393

Job! I'm hiring a 2-yr postdoc at
UCM for Fall 2023 to model the cultural evolution of complex social identities and associated signaling strategies, in collaboration w
Adrian Bell. More info here. Please reach out with any questions! aprecruit.ucmerced.edu/JPF0156

2. Specifically (this is my gloss, emphasizing areas of agreement, but I think it is basically accurate), we don't have experts who understand both (1) AI and (2) complex social systems, and we need both to understand the consequences. That is right!

Show thread

This is an outstanding reply to, and analysis of that Pamela Paul column in the New York Times that began this way:

"A paper that says science should be impartial was rejected by major journals. You can’t make this up."

Dave Karpf, an academic, takes it apart. He also testifies as a particiant in the peer review system. Worth your time.

davekarpf.substack.com/p/pamel

#nytimes #journalism #peerreview #science

Job! I'm hiring a 2-yr postdoc at @UCMCogSci for Fall 2023 to model the cultural evolution of complex social identities and associated signaling strategies. More info here. Please reach out with any questions!
aprecruit.ucmerced.edu/JPF0156

Job! I'm hiring a 2-yr postdoc at @UCMCogSci for Fall 2023 to model the cultural evolution of complex social identities and associated signaling strategies. More info here. Please reach out with any questions!
aprecruit.ucmerced.edu/JPF0156

@zefferman More than that -- "refraining" implies an opportunity or impetus to do something and choosing not to. So it's possible to interpret this as implying that overtly sexist people do more leading by example if they sometimes choose not to say something sexist than do people for whom sexist thoughts simply fail to occur.

@zefferman Other ways of leading by example: not walking off cliffs, not defecating in public, refraining from public drunkenness.

I'm an author on the research being profiled in this LA Times article, but few things have convinced me about the extent to which Twitter has become a toxic place as much as the responses to the tweet of the article by the @latimes. latimes.com/business/technolog

(link to tweet: twitter.com/latimes/status/165)

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.