In the Russian media, two points of view on the effectiveness of the Iranian attack now prevail. Unlike the Arab media, where memes, cackling, mocking and discrediting the Iranian army prevail.

The first: the Iranians are great, they hit all the targets, no one was hurt (except for 44 Mossad agents who were sitting at the airbase for some reason waiting for the strike), that's the way to go, all the targets were hit, the praised Israeli "Iron Dome cracked (this is a direct quote from Channel One), we had to ask the Americans for help.

Just in case I explain for the mentally retarded: Iron Dome was not involved in repelling the Iranian attack, it is a short-range interception system for very close threats with a very short flight time. If it had "cracked" it would have been a bit late to ask for help. Had the drones gotten there, then the LC would have been engaged, but no UAVs made it, all passed well outside of Israel. Ballistics such as the one used by the Iranians cannot and should not be intercepted by an ICBM, and the power of the Tamir anti-missile system will not allow a heavy missile to be knocked off course.

Second: It was a "deal", the Iranians had advance warning, everyone had prepared in advance, and the Iranians were "testing" the Israeli missile defense system. This somewhat refutes, by the way, the first version. If they warned in advance and "all prepared in advance", why they had to "ask for help" from the US. But nobody cares about the conformity of versions in the Horde. Whoever received what methodology, writes that way.