**Odessa: Drone Strikes and Defense Measures**

In recent days, widely circulated footage has shown mobile fire groups countering kamikaze drone attacks on Odessa. These groups rely on small arms to intercept Shahed-136 drones, which have proven to be an efficient and cost-effective alternative to air defense systems (ADS) struggling with resource shortages.

However, Odessa’s geography significantly limits the maneuverability of mobile groups, making them less effective compared to other cities like Kyiv. Most drones approach Odessa from the sea, targeting port infrastructure or urban areas located just 1–2 kilometers inland. Under such conditions, mobile groups find it challenging to intercept threats over open waters.

To strengthen the city’s defenses, existing counter-drone methods must be supplemented with a barrier of short- and medium-range surface-to-air missile (SAM) systems along the coastline. Deploying at least two batteries could neutralize kamikaze drones over the sea before they reach the city limits.

Admittedly, intercepting drones with missiles is expensive. However, this remains a necessary measure to mitigate the damage caused by both successful drone strikes and falling debris.

The implementation of such defenses heavily depends on international support. Unfortunately, after nearly three years of war, many commitments have either been delayed or are subject to factors beyond our control.

Finally, while the delivery of military vessels like the CombatBoat 90H is a significant development, there is a need for less pomp and more focus on the quiet and efficient integration of this equipment into operational use.

_Protecting Odessa and its critical infrastructure must remain a top priority._