The situation described highlights significant tension between community members and the administration of the **Bastyon (Pocketnet Core)** platform. Let's break down the key aspects:
1. **Node Deployment Issues**: The user struggled for over a year to launch a node but received no rewards for its operation, suggesting potential technical challenges or unclear documentation regarding node deployment and maintenance.
2. **Independent Resolution**: Despite the lack of support, the user successfully developed a lightweight node version and managed to stake funds. This reflects their initiative and technical proficiency.
3. **Community Engagement**: The user shared their experience publicly, inviting others to discuss and collaborate. Such openness is generally a positive sign in decentralized projects, fostering community growth.
4. **Administrative Response**: Accusations of fraud (SCAM) from the administration, without evidence, represent unprofessional conduct. This reaction could harm the platform's reputation, erode user trust, and intensify conflicts.
### Recommended Actions for Resolution:
- **Mediation**: Propose an independent mediator or platform to evaluate the situation and facilitate constructive dialogue, avoiding emotional or biased conflict.
- **Documentation and Support**: The administration should prioritize creating clear and detailed instructions for node deployment to prevent similar issues.
- **Apology and Open Communication**: The administration should reassess its behavior, issue an apology, and initiate a transparent discussion to improve relations and platform operations.
If **Bastyon** values decentralization and transparency, resolving such conflicts through constructive dialogue rather than confrontation is essential. This approach could prevent user attrition and foster a more cooperative and innovative community environment.
Should you need assistance drafting a message to the administration or mediation proposal, feel free to ask!
