| death | IntelligenceDeterminism or the logic of philosophy
Belief(1) = (Believing in god/heaven/immortality) = (Having hope.)
Belief(2) = (Believing in the (non-existence of god/heaven/immortality)) = (Having no hope.)
Both: (1) and (2) = (are faith).
To prove one of these theories, (1) or (2), you must be omniscient about everything that exists, which is not possible for mankind.
(1) includes the hope, that one day god herself/himself will prove her/his existence to mankind.
(2) is a belief with no hope, the non-existence of god will never prove itself to mankind, that is not possible.
If (2) = true, then the person who believes in (1) will not be disappointed after death, because if one no longer exists, then there is no disappointment either. The state of the disappointed person can no longer arise.
If (1) = true, then the person who believes in (2) will not be disappointed after death, because if you wake up in an immortal, peaceful heaven/nirvana and god explains to you, that you will be healthy from now on, for ever, then there is no disappointment. The state of the disappointed person can no longer arise.
You could say the sentence: The hope from people who (2) = that the theory (2) is wrong and that (1) = true.
Page 4 from 23
You could say the sentence: ((A healthy psyche) must be based on reality) = ((I do not know) if (1) or (2) = true) + (when it comes to the question of (1) or (2), I must decide for (1))
You can not pray to the absolute death(2) and believing in the same moment, that choosing Beliefe(2) would be a healthy decission compared to the story of Beliefe(1).
My teaching is about an absolute innocent and pure belief about (1)
I do not talk from the known religions, when I talk from (1).
Too many religions are questionable and corrupt with their concepts / rules, in the context of: The whole concept of (1) must result in a healthy psyche.
I absolutly respect all-embracingly the religious people of this Universe and other Universes.
