Everything I said about the Plandemic just came true for the American Public and hopefully, the whole ball of wax.
Large parts of the world already knew this of course, but oh no, dragging a rabid American hate-filled leftist into the Light is like special needs babysitting. Europe contributed so much meme to the unfolding American mental mis-treatment of the situation.
Some powerful ugly hate-filled or mean or alligator-crying faces tried to destroy my Wife and I and nearly did even though Western Arizona was having none of it. Only the recently imported. Tried to destroy America.
Instead, we won, a twist of fate perhaps. A plan perhaps.
Remember that I did not try to persecute or worse what they contributed to and did. I told you I'm powerfully naturally immune, here I am.
Re-read the below again and again. WE were right, I was right, you know who got reverse punked.
The rabid Left must come their senses and slowly march toward this new reality or it will be dangerous for their mental health letting it hit them in an un-planned moment all at once.
I bet a large part of young teenage girls that committed suicide being divine feminine but overly environmentally tuned --- suicided at the beginning thinking that the world was gonna be fubar and not beautiful. Thing is, it was too. Millions got ruined or died because of bad mandates.
Some people responsible have an immense debt that may never be able to be re-payed to Humanity.
December 04, 2024 COVID FINAL REPORT
https://oversight.house.gov/release/final-report-covid-select-concludes-2-year-investigation-issues-500-page-final-report-on-lessons-learned-and-the-path-forward/
@wravoc I have never seen a report so distorted by ideology. There is no chance that a single line in this report is true: there is an enormous scientific consensus that refutes all these claims.
"There is no chance that a single line in this report is true"
Extremist. Statistically one single line must be true. I could probably prove that but I'd be wasting my time as that statement is absurd.
There is also a large and more importantly, Independently Verified body of work along with OFFICIAL DATA as this report was _based on_ supported by multiple Government Whistleblowers that HAVE overtaken and won out against your outdated predisposition to which you so desperately cling.
@wravoc
I think that if we go any further in the exchange, you will say that the scientific consensus of the overwhelming majority of public health specialists is the work of leftists, and that they are therefore not to be trusted.
I wasn't referring to the origin of the virus. In any case, if this is true, it would mean that the United States is as responsible as China, since both parties were involved in the studies.
@olireiv My views are extremely matrixed, in-depth, a very complicated world view of systems of systems. Your bland rhetoric is irrelevant.
I did not highlight any origin text yet interestingly you yourself proffer an explanation that fits and is being persued.
@wravoc "I did not highlight any origin text yet interestingly you yourself proffer an explanation that fits and is being persued."
It is what the matrix highlights.
If you wish to talk about it, I actually went through part of the report (rather than just stop at the summary)
https://qoto.org/@rastinza/113674830383053109
The information contained in the report is indeed true: it is mostly emails and messages between people involved and interviews to the same.
However, the conclusions of the report, what is available in the summary, is not really supported by any of that.
Regarding whistleblowers, I only read the first 100 pages but there is no mention of any whistleblower in there.
We can discuss it further if you wish.
Any way, since I am here I'll have to point out that Elias is correct: he is presenting official data from a government who conducted a 2 years investigation. Accusing a report of such importance to be distorted without taking a look at it really is preconceived. Moreover, he did not talk about countries or parties and I do not really see why you'd accuse him of political radicalism or preconceived ideas. Scientific consensus can change and an investigation is a very valid and effective way to find out what happened in a certain occasion, it is in fact a much better tool for that than scientific research. However, the investigation should be conducted in a good way to serve as such tool; in this case it does not appear to me that the investigation was well done, nor that they really used it to reach some conclusions. It really like they wrote down some conclusions and then wrote a 500 pages document to justify those conclusions hoping nobody would actually read it.
