@anon_opin Just bag up at the end, after paying
I think the biggest weakness of vibe coding is that you can very quickly code the wrong thing. Some of my most productive moments have been 5 minutes of thinking in the shower, forcing me to re-evaluate my entire plan. But you're unlikely to have those "shower thoughts" if you aren't grinding away at the problem yourself.
Struggling with vibe coding? You just need to get better at prompting. Here is a six video series "course" to teach you how to write the most effective AI prompts and get the most out of vibe coding!
(Do you ever wonder what it would be like if there were some special language for giving commands to computers... a kind of prompting language so they would do *exactly* what you wanted? Maybe someone should invent that.)
The fact that one of the biggest hurdles to police investigating bike theft is because nobody has taught them about binary search is just infuriating https://www.londoncentric.media/p/driverless-taxis-waymo-wayve-are-coming-to-london?open=false#%C2%A7the-police-wont-investigate-bike-theft-because-theres-too-much-cctv-to-review-why-wont-they-adopt-this-simple-mathematical-trick
Maybe you've had this experience when you walk into an empty room and see all kinds of possibilities, but when the room's furnished all you can see is "Sofa goes *there*", and it's hard to unsee it.
Perhaps if it was just a pile of cardboard boxes with "SOFA" written on them, we might find it easier to let go of that decision?
I've found that prototypes work best when they look like something we'd be happy throwing away.
@anon_opin Make sense, with the small exception for the few monthly costs like mortgage, rent, energy bill, council tax, water bill, broadband, mobile, insurance, subscriptions, everything else is paid weekly
I am cautiously pro-LLM in my own work, but collectively I fear the car is the predictive historical model: small wins for individuals + huge wins for a handful → massive externalities and collective action problems that will take generations to fix.
From: @straphanger
https://urbanists.social/@straphanger/115140521581949962
@mirabilos @anon_opin @derickr TIL, there is actually a semantic slash character that pretty much does work as I describe, albeit without the needed for interspersing zero width joiners: https://unicodeplus.com/U+2044 It's just that as a result if you want to write a mixed fraction then you need a zero width non joiner (https://stackoverflow.com/questions/55033436/how-to-display-the-fraction-15-16-nicely-in-unicode#comment108667167_55034877). The biggest problem seems to be that its not universally supported though, hence why smooshing superscripts and subscripts still seems to be the best approach
@anon_opin Would be much better if there was a fractional combining slash, which when combined with the zero width joiner interspersed between numerical digits either side would form a single grapheme cluster for any arbitrary fraction.
Software engineer by trade. Programmer by hobby too (in addition to basketry and spoon carving). Personal website: https://rlamacraft.uk/. Gemini capsule: gemini://gemini.rlamacraft.uk