Observing what some are calling "growing pains" with how Mastodon instances moderate minority voices is reinforcing what free speech advocates like @popehat have preach for years - that it is the ability for minorities to share their perspectives even if that is uncomfortable for the majority which is the most important function of free speech.
I have wondered about "...there would be freedom of expression with all the discomfort that inevitability leads to." the applicability of the 1st Amendment to modern global spanning, speed-of-light messaging.
"..which neatly divides the users into acceptable and unacceptable..." What is acceptable? The deplorable thinks his statements should be acceptable, and others are not, which Anomielia the #DREADpirate @geekgirl397 pointed out.
@geekgirl397
Or us supporting with donations.
@antares
@rmerriam Thus the word "fallacy". There is not a bright line that defines acceptable behavior, however many instance admins acting like there is and all they need to do to make Mastodon into the promised land of social media is to aggressively enforce that line.