@board 今天傍晚,这位因为去了亮马桥而被刑拘的朋友从朝阳看守所出来了。为他高兴,也想记录一下这段时间的观察。
1、看到很多人说,被刑拘的几乎都是女性,一位叫lola的象友说:“如果你认为其原因是男性抗议者的亲友没有发声,所以我们没看见他们,那恰恰也说明了发声的女性数量非常多”。这位被抓的朋友是一位男性。我并不想贬损任何他的朋友,但在我试图和另一位女性朋友一起帮他找律师并公开他的信息时,我被莫名其妙拉到了一个他的朋友的群里。他的男性铁磁们给出的说法是,“你这么做不是要把他老板的公司毁了吗”;“这还是看他家属的意见”。我不认识这些人,但我知道他们一定是男的,因为女孩不会这样说话。 他们的言下之意不管三七二十一先把你否定了,看起来在替别人考虑,实际上他们真的认为自己能教你点什么。他们自始至终什么都没做,只是看看热闹,显得自己很正义。真正做事的人永远都只是女性。一起帮忙联系律师的朋友,她甚至跟这位被抓的朋友并不熟。他的妈妈和大姨也是奔走的主力,不管是一次次来到北京,还是联系律师,找关系,包括今天从看守所出来,也是大姨把他接回了家。
2、家属心态的转变很有意思。他的妈妈很好,自始至终不觉得他做错了任何事,支持他的行为。但一开始他妈妈的想法有些迟疑,比如要不要请律师帮忙去看看守所看看孩子,以及要不要公布他的个人信息,阿姨一开始并不情愿。她认为和家属对接的警察很客气,不希望和对方“对着干”,甚至也发过包括从爷爷辈开始的工作和党龄等家庭背景介绍的短信给警察,试图证明儿子根正苗红,绝无二心。后来,阿姨发现这样没用,坚定了请律师的想法,不管是放人还是判刑,必须请律师进去帮忙看看孩子,她不再相信警察维稳的说法,“就是糊弄我们拖延时间”。她说,警察一直安抚他们,但是并没有什么有效信息。你看,他们其实怂得很,怕家属闹事,也拿捏了家属对孩子的担心。他们当然没有有效信息,因为所有的操作都是黑箱。阿姨后来跟我聊,她说警察即便已经定性这人问题不大,“心性不坏”,也要一直关着,不给明确放人时间,这样不但惩罚了当事人,也震慑了家属和朋友。我觉得警察的说法很好笑,这帮人有什么资格评判一个人心性坏不坏呢?好坏的定义又是什么?进去的这些人谁又是真正的“坏人”?阿姨说,这些年轻人“有思想,正能量,有文化的人,但是不被需要”,他们的思想是危险的。几天前,阿姨说这件事改变了她很多想法,包括她对社会的看法,和她的信仰。她没说透,但我理解了。
3、如果没有这件事,我可能还是法盲。希望每个人都了解一些基本的法律知识,它总归用得上。
4、这些日子除了帮忙联系律师,帮忙搜集信息,做得最多的就是帮他的妈妈缓解焦虑,积极准备,但是保持心情稳定。关于我为什么要帮这位朋友,实话讲我们并不是那种特别要好的关系,他说我在他的微信置顶里,但你知道吧他微信置顶有30多个人……我没想太多我应该做到什么程度,没想过值不值,这就是我该做的事,就像他走向了亮马桥,他觉得这是他该做的事一样。正是因为我知道难,也许他的家属能获得的信息并不多,也许他的朋友不知道要怎么帮他,我才应该做。他出来了,我为他高兴,但我不会认为他欠我任何东西。此时此刻元宵节还没过完,祝他平安。
看过《伊尼舍林的报丧女妖》
https://neodb.social/movie/6s7s5zysbPT48htL0GQnxC
我无法做出评价的一部电影。只能说虽然看得云里雾里,却也一气呵成地跟着镜头走完了全程。
Just recalled one stand-up show joking about the greatest incitement of an on-site office work was the freedom to use the printer (cannot remember the exact words and the comedian…). This is exactly how I feel when I choose to print out some *elegant* papers. It gives me the illusion that I am hardworking. ![]()
I'll admit to being skeptical about "synthetic biology", wondering if it's just buzz words, but this recent paper from Daniels et al. blew me away with its combination of novel insights into cell signaling circuitry & its clinical potential 1/n
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36480602/
看过《要喝杯咖啡吗?》 :star_solid: :star_solid: :star_solid: :star_solid: :star_half:
https://neodb.social/tv/6WLe4WZnr34pvDHYwRTJOh
久违的观剧体验。温暖的人性总是如此熠熠生辉,令人着迷。
"I build little people out of acorns and sticks, then photograph them in the wild with real animals.
Join me as I share my process of building and photographing.
Learn more and buy prints at www.davidmbird.com."
好文章呢。p药进入医保失败之际,很少有角度注意到这样的抗疫急需物资让医保而不是政府参与采购谈判本身就是有问题的。可能我们对政府的不作为、对自民间向上问责监督的无力都太过习以为常,甚至都忘记了这是需要政府负责的时刻
https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/zJ2LT0OCriSzixE7jMSdkA
First ER experience here yesterday. It was not severe but still a rather helpless moment. Just want to record my thoughts from that.
It felt like desperately forever of each wait time;
I felt myself ignorant having the complaint of my unluckiness right after a new year started after I arrived at the ER waiting room;
The medical staff have their very distinct styles yet with something in common: competency and compassion. Appreciated all they had done to fix my problem;
MILLION THANKS to my MrY.
美国心理学会期刊《心理学评论》发表了一篇论文,研究结论是过好一生(good life)并不意味着 1. 富足、舒适和活跃的社交,也并非 2. 寻找人生使命与实现价值,而是做到精神丰富(psychologically rich)。精神丰富的人生要有精彩的体验,在或新奇或曲折的经历中人的观念也会发生深刻的改变(interesting experiences in which novelty and/or complexity are accompanied by profound changes in perspective)。
这些体验包括出国留学、选择一条更难的职业道路、体验前卫的艺术(论文所举的例是乔伊斯的《尤利西斯》)。更重要的一个发现是,这种体验不一定要是愉快体验。战乱、自然灾害、膝下无孩、慢性病痛、失业(or出生在洼地)……即使备受煎熬,也可从中收获价值,重塑自己对于自我和世界的理解。
把精神丰富纳入对美好生活的构想,挑战和困难也就有了意义。一帆风顺并非生活本义,山重水复疑无路也有它的价值。(Adding psychological richness to our conceptions of what a good life can look like, Westgate says, is important because it “makes room for challenge and difficulty. It’s not just about ‘everything going well and smoothly.’ Stretching and going through uncomfortable experiences, there is value in that.”)
https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2022.12.21.521373v1 BioNumPy: Fast and easy analysis of biological data with Python
CW: COVID19 and thoughts on where we're headed with the virus
It's deeply concerning to see signs that many countries around the world are moving from viewing the virus as a Pandemic to accepting it's Endemic. In other words, it's here for decades or longer. "Let it rip" has been a disastrous failure of government public health policy because "hybrid immunity" is a myth. It always was.
Our best hope of eradicating the virus in our lifetime is development of an omnivalent COVID vaccine. That said, it's more likely that permanent protection from COVID will instead be an option that's taken-up only by people who are well-off, educated, and not immune-compromised.
For those who still look at stats, roughly speaking, it seems like the Reff is hovering around 1.0 with fluctuations from approximately 0.8 to 1.2 depending on seasonal cycles and the yearly social/work/school calendar. I know a number of people who've caught COVID two or three times, and I'm certain that some of them are catching it again right now now due at xmas/NYE events and holiday travel.
For the foreseeable future, the majority of people will catch COVID once or twice a year. It's like how people think it's "normal" to catch a serious cold or the flu every year. It's because people aren't taking enough precautions with masks and isolation, and governments and business aren't working to set good standards for ventilation.
Getting sick with COVID carries about a 20% chance of it leading to chronic illness or some form of Long COVID. Catching COVID multiple times means you gamble and roll the dice every time to see if you get Long COVID.
In 2023, it's important that you keep-up:
- Wearing a mask when indoors in public.
- Working from home if possible.
- Doing a RAT if you have any symptoms.
- Caring about people with chronic illness.
#COVID #COVID19 #COVID19Aus #CovidIsNotOver #Pandemic #Endemic #COVIDEndemic #LetItRip #LongCOVID #HybridImmunity
隔三差五就要看到完全否定动物园意义的人忍不住想说一下,中国的情况没有任何代表意义,它宣称的太多东西实际上不都是相反的吗,动物园也不例外。真正的动物园恰恰承担的就是救助、教育工作,它救援被人伤害无法回归野外的动物,给它们提供良好的条件,在保障它们自身福利优先的前提下对外开放游览,而游览中也以教育和公益为目的,除了科普大众知识外,盈利也进一步用于野生动物的救援保护工作。人类的文明程度是一个很虚幻的概念,一个切面不能代表全部,特别是中国这种极端案例。动物表演本来就是现代动物园理念中坚定抵制的内容。国外有很多动物福祉、游览、救助等等都做得非常好的动物园。如果说一个理想化的世界,可能是没有动物园的,但那个世界还很遥远。如果不认识到动物园的真正意义、没有做更多功课就只觉得动物园不该存在的话,更无法到达那个世界。受到人类伤害的动物人类有义务救助他们,教育和启蒙需要时间,动物园承担的就是这个桥梁的作用。否则全靠完全无法盈利的公益组织吗?野生动物纪录片难道就没有道德问题吗?不用说畜牧养殖宠物等等,人类和动物和自然的关系不是简单的取消“野蛮”的动物园就能神奇解决的。
有很多相关的资料可以去了解真正动物园的理念,我也只是稍微集中看过一些东西而已,可能讲的也不完全对。有一部纪录片《方舟后裔》(The Heirs to the Ark),一篇非常有名的文章《如何展示一只牛蛙》(1968年),国内也有很多做动物和动物园相关科普的自媒体人,也有一些较为用心较为现代的动物园。然而整体环境在这里。总的来说我们普遍容易接收到的知识距离现代社会太远以至于空想出来的反驳实际上都脱离不出被限制的框架。并不是没有路的。我们对动物园这个概念的印象,可能已经落后了文明世界半个世纪以上。
最近也发现一个非常好的动物园,有自己的YouTube频道,动物们生活质量都很高,视频非常好看,随便贴一个收藏的链接吧 https://youtu.be/s6kNKbLG28c (不过在它评论区我也看到说动物园不该存在这种声音,但也承认这家动物园很好。只能说教育工作依旧任重道远。)
Be inclusive as a person.
Be quantitative as a learner.
a graduate student in biological sciences
「生活方式西化」